arrow left
arrow right
  • DO WOO KIM, ET AL. VS HYUN JONG HAN, ET AL. Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DO WOO KIM, ET AL. VS HYUN JONG HAN, ET AL. Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/30/2019 04:40 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk Jae S. Kim, Esq. (State Bar No.: 134336) 1 James A. Prietto, Esq. (State Bar No.: 136831) LAW FIRM OF J.S.KIM & ASSOCIATES 2 3600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 914 3 Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (213) 389-0884 4 Facsimile: (213) 389-0885 JSKIM@JSKIMLAW.COM 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, THE WILTON KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN LOS ANGELES, et al. 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – STANLEY MOSK 9 THE WILTON KOREAN Case No: 19STCV16827 10 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN LOS (Consolidated with 19STCP02628) ANGELES, a Non-Profit Religious 11 Corporation; DO WOO KIM, an individual; [Assigned to the Hon. Richard E. Rico in Dept. DO RIM KIM, an individual; 17] 12 13 Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF JAE S KIM 14 (Filed Concurrently with Plaintiffs’Opposition to vs. Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Order 15 Striking or Alternatively Continuing the Hearing HYUN JONG HAN, an individual; YONG Date) 16 CHUL CHO, an individual; FRANCIS KIM, an individual; NEE DON CHU, an Date: September 3, 2019 17 individual; DAE WON PARK, an Time: 8:30 a.m. individual; & DOES 1 through 50, inclusive Location: Dept. 17 18 Defendants, Complaint Filed: May 14, 2019 19 Trial Date: None 20 DECLARATION OF JAE SOO KIM 21 1. I, Jae Soo Kim, declare as follows: 22 2. I am over the age of 18 and have personal knowledge of the facts declared herein. If called 23 upon to testify, I could and would do so. 24 3. I am licensed to practice law in the State of California. 25 4. On August 15, 2019, Judge Strobel in Department 82 allowed the Plaintiffs to manage 26 and/or control CHURCH’s properties other than Sunday mornings wherein Defendants 27 would be allowed to engage in worship services. The court specifically stated that the 28 Plaintiffs are allowed to have their CCTV and their guards. The court specifically denied 1 DECLARATION OF JAE S KIM