Motion-Secondary: DO WOO KIM, ET AL. VS HYUN JONG HAN, ET AL.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/12/2019 09:47 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk




                            David Y. Nakatsu, Esq. (State Bar No: 183050)
                     1
                            THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID Y. NAKATSU
                     2      8500 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 916
                            Beverly Hills, California 90211
                     3      Telephone:     (424) 291-5944
                            LAWOFFICESDYN@GMAIL.COM
                     4

                     5      Jae S. Kim, Esq. (State Bar No.: 134336)
                            James A. Prietto, Esq. (State Bar No.: 136831)
                     6      LAW FIRM OF J.S.KIM & ASSOCIATES
                            3600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 914
                     7      Los Angeles, California 90010
                            Telephone: (213) 389-0884
                     8      Facsimile: (213) 389-0885
                            JSKIM@JSKIMLAW.COM
                     9
                             Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
                    10       THE WILTON KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN LOS ANGELES, et al.
                    11                              SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                                  FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – STANLEY MOSK
                    12

                    13       THE WILTON KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN                                              Case No. 19STCV16827
                             CHURCH IN LOS ANGELES, a Non-Profit                                         (Consolidated with 19STCP02628)
                    14       Religious Corporation; DO WOO KIM, an
                             individual; DO RIM KIM, an individual;                                      [Assigned to the Hon. Richard Rico in Dept.
                    15                                                                                   17]
                    16                                            Plaintiffs,                             PLAINTIFFS’ DO WOO KIM and DO
                                                                                                          RIM KIM’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
                    17                                                                                    MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
                             vs.                                                                          INJUNCTION
                    18
                             HYUN JONG HAN, an individual; YONG                                           (Filed Concurrently with Evidentiary
                    19       CHUL CHO, an individual; FRANCIS KIM,                                        Objection to Request for Judicial Notice)
                             an individual; NEE DON CHU, an individual;
                    20       DAE WON PARK, an individual; & DOES 1                                        Hearing Date: 9/19/2019
                             through 50, inclusive                                                        Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m.
                    21                                                                                    Dept No.: 17
                                                                     Defendants,
                    22                                                                                    Complaint filed: June 28, 2019
                                                                                                          Trial Date: None
                    23
                            TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
                    24
                                       Plaintiffs The Wilton Korean Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles (“CHURCH”), Do
                    25
                            Woo Kim (“WOO”) and Do Rim Kim (“RIM”) submit the following Reply in support of
                    26
                            Plaintiffs’ Preliminary Injunction Motion. Defendants’ Opposition is late. The Motion was
                    27
                            originally to be heard on August 15 and the Defendants chose not to file an Opposition. This
                    28



                                                                                                           1
                                   PLAINTIFFS’ DO WOO KIM and DO RIM KIM’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
                                                                        INJUNCTION