arrow left
arrow right
  • DO WOO KIM, ET AL. VS HYUN JONG HAN, ET AL. Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DO WOO KIM, ET AL. VS HYUN JONG HAN, ET AL. Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Honorable Richard Rico Thursday—September 19, 2019 Department 17 Calendar No. 6 PROCEEDING: The Wilton Korean Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles, Kim, et al. FIL Sup erior Court of California y. Han et al. ‘ounty of Los Angeles 19STCV16827 Motion for Preliminary Injunction sep 1 2018 “aaIMS Sherri Bat/Clerk ¢ RULING By. Deputy This is a corporate governance dispute that arose among the members of the directors of Plaintiff The Wilton Korean Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles, a nonprofit religious entity (“Church”). (Compl. § 1.). As alleged in the Complaint, chairman of the board Do Woo Kim (“Woo”) and secretary Do Rim Kim (“Rim”) are also Plaintiffs. (Compl. {§ 2- 3.) This case is related to Wilton Korean Presbyterian Church, et al. v. Do Woo Kim et al., L.A. Superior Court case No. 19STCP02628. Woo ad Rim, who are the Plaintiffs in the consolidated action, are the defendants in the related case. Church was originally founded by Pastor Steve Do Kim (“Steve”). (Compl. § 12.) Church’s first board of directors was selected on February 26, 2006, and it consisted of Steve, Plaintiff Woo, Plaintiff Rim, Defendant Yong Chul Cho (“Cho”), and nonparty Won Bo Shim (“Shim”). (Compl. § 14.) Shim passed away in late 2017. Pastor Steve passed away in January 2018. (Compl. 4 12, 17.) On January 7, 2018, Church hired Defendant Hyun Jong Han (“Han”) as its new pastor. (Compl. § 20.) The Complaint alleges that Han, along with his Co-Defendants — Cho, former employee Francis Kim (“Kim”), Thomas Chu (“Chu”), and Dae Won Park (“Park”) — all subsequently took action to the detriment of Church by misappropriating funds and interfering with Church management and worship services. (Compl. {| 24-26.) As alleged, on May 5, 2019, Pastor Han’s employment was terminated. (Compl. § 4.) As alleged, on May 13, 2019, Church excommunicated Han, Cho!, and Kim. (Compl. {§ 4- 6.) Given these allegations, Plaintiffs assert that they, along with Cho, are the only current members of the board of directors “as Steve and Shim have both passed away and no new directors have been selected yet.” (Compl. § 18.) Defendants dispute Woo’s and Rim’s status as board members and their ability to act on Church’s behalf. (Compl. {| 28.) On August 14, 2019, the Court ruled on Defendants’ demurrer to Plaintiffs’ complaint. Demurrer was overruled as to the declaratory relief cause of action and was sustained as _—_ "Tt is unclear how Cho was excommunicated (Compl. § 5) but still remains a member of the Church board of directors (Compl. { 18).