arrow left
arrow right
  • MARTIN HERNANDEZ VS WALSH/SHEA CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTORS, ET AL. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARTIN HERNANDEZ VS WALSH/SHEA CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTORS, ET AL. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/01/2019 09:49 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Galicia,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY ORPARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name. State Bar number. and address): FOR COURT USE ONL Y Kimberly C. Carter (SBN 221283); Tahir L Boykins (SBN 323441) Kelley Drye & Warren LLP 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 23rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067 TELEPHONE NO.(310) 712-6100 FAXNO(Optional) (310) 712-6199 E-MAIL ADDRESS(OPtional)kcarter@kelleydrye.com;tboykins@kelleydrye.com ATTORNEY FOR(Name) Defendant Walsh Shea Corridor Constructors, et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LU::; ANGt:U::::; STREET ADDRESS 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: same CITYANDZIPCODE Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAMEStanley Mosk PLAINTIFFIPETITIONER Martin Hernandez DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Walsh Shea Corridor Constructors, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER (Check one): 0 UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE 19STCV18722 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date October 16,2019 Time: 8:30 AM Dept 15 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided_ 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. 0 This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendants Walsh Shea Corridor Constructors, et al. b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names). 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date) May 29, 2019 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint 0 D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT Pa e 1 of 5 Form Adopted forMandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal.Rules ofCourt, Judicial Council of California rules3.720-3.730 CM-11 0 [Rev. July 1. 2011] www.courts.ca.gov