arrow left
arrow right
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

2023-@5-19 @2:43 PDT Ali adeh +18156e@2556 PAGE 16/'St ~~ WN DocuSign Envelope (0: 4089S0C7-02A9-454 BBLI8/-SBBALIUE 7498F SUPERIOR cour OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. All Odeh SAN BERNARDING DISTRICT rh 14167 Flamingo Bay Ln. Moreno Valley, California 92553 MAY 1.9 2023 Telephone: (815) 600-2550 _ p, E-Mail: 1275@yahoo,com BY. puity ae yi SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 8 ALT ODER, © Case No.: CIVDS 1823772 ; Hon. Judge John M. Pacheco 9 Praintiff, vs. PLAINTIFF ALI ODEH’S YW EMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF R IOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, LYNGLADEN FERNANDEZ, DDS, ST. AL 3 OR IN ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY Defendants, ADJUDICATION ON PLAINTIFER’S 14 SE ND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1S (Notice Of Motion: Plaintiff's Separate 16 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts: Separately Bounded Appendix of Exhibits; Declaration of Ali Odeh; Declaration of Argel Jai yi; and [Proposed] Order Filed 18 Concurrently Herewith) 19 20 EARING SCHED! ite: Augasi 1, 2 21 Time: 8:30 AM. 22 Dept: S31 3 23 24 ACTION FILED: September 1), 2018 28 RIAL: August 28, 2023 26 27 28 ee DRA 1G ND AUTE OF DE FOR. SUMMARY ny MGMENT, OR OS RNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICA CANE. NOL WS ESQI7T72 DOTEOU PE DAEMEEY OF IF 2623-@5-19 @2:49 POT Ali odeh +181566@2556 PAGE 11/'S¢ ~ Docudign Envelope 1: 4D39S0C7-DZA9-4348-9D87-S98oUUE /s96F Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTE, pon snetanene I INPRODUCTION sven H STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FA es A. DEPENDANTS AND THEIR DANGEROUS POLICIES AND PRACTIC B TREATM) A'TRINGSLY DENTISTRY ENDED WITHA BOTCHED ROOT CANAL DONE WITIOUT CONSENT 10 First Visit. Secon] Appointment. Third Appointment. 12 4 Root canal done without! consent. 43 ¢ THE OPERATIVE SECOND AMENDED Ct LAINE AND) PERT ‘NT 4 PROCEDURAL HISTORY 9 15 Business atid Professions Code 16 Banery 7 Gress Negtigence 10 WwW Misrepresentation, 10 19 Relief Saug 10 Qh 10. Pertinent Procedural History . 10 2k If, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS APPROPRIATE WHERE THE MOVING PARTY 22 DEMONSTRATES THERE ARE NOT TRIABLE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT u 23 IV. ARGUME! seveencesesny “0 sanasaecennnncensaneeeion sienee {2 24 Dd. DEFENDANTS’ PRACTICES ARE AGAINST ST JARD OF 25 DEMONSTRATE GROSS NEGLIGENCG. wm 26 E DEFENDANTS’ NEGLIGENCE IS OBVIOUS ICELAYMAN 13 27 KINSGLY DENTISTRY ALLOWED ADM. TRATION OF ANE TESTA WITHOUT 28 A K OF PAT ¥ ALS 4 MEMORANDL OF POINT AND é HORT: EN SUPFO! POF PLAINTIFF ALTC H YON FOR MARY JUDG! NT, OK IN ALTERNATEV SUMMAKY MUDICATIONoN CAS: , CAVIIS BIITIZ DNeiey TE DAE AN OE” tat