On September 11, 2018 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bradbury D.D.S., Michael G,
Bradbury, Rhonda,
Odeh, Ali,
and
Cohan, Kat,
Odeh, Ali,
Fernandez D.D.S, Lyngladen,
Fernandez Dds, Lyngladen,
Kingsley Dentistry,
Kingsly Dentistry,
Lyngadlen Fernandez Dds,
Lyngladen Fernandez D.D.S.,
Ringo Bangalan Dds,
Silagan-Fernandez D.D.S., Lyngadlen,
Suarez-Fernandez Dentistry,
Suarez Fernandez Dentistry And Ringo Bangalan, Dds,
for Medical Malpractice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
i L
1 Thomas R Bradford Esq Bar No 110230
Sherry Gregorio Esq Bar No 263856 su io cc k Gf CALIF t RNlA
2 Alexa L Halloran Esq Bar No 315470 cout rv m rvA mNo
S 8 r rRicr
PETERSON BRADFORD BURKWITZ
3 100 North First Street Suite 300 JUN 11 il Lr
Burbank Califomia 91502
4 818 562 5800
5 Attorneys for Defendant Deputy
RINGO BANGALAN D D S
6
7
g SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
g COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
Ali Odeh Case No CIVDS1823772
11
Assigned to the Honorable Wilfred J Schneider Jr
12 Plaintiff Dept S32
0
13 vs DEFENDANT RINGO BANGALAN D D S S
N
NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF S
m
14 Lyngadlen Fernandez DDS Suarez Fernandez OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO FIRST
@o Dentistry and Ringo Bangalan DDS AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
o o
o 15
Defendants Hearing Date June 19 2019
m L 16 Time 8 30 a m
Dept S32
o Z m
w 17
18
First Amended Compiaint December 21 2018
g Complaint Filed September 11 2018
i
20
TO THE COURT ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD
21 i
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Ringo Bangalan D D S received no opposition to his j
22
Demurrer to Plaintiff s First Amentled Verified Complaint The Demurrer was served on Plaintiff s counsel
23
and thereafter filed with the Court on May 13 2019 The hearing on the Demurrer is scheduled to be heard
24
on June 19 2019 at 8 30 a m in Department S32
25
Under California Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 b Plaintiff s opposition to the tlemurrer was
26
due on June 6 2019 nine 9 court tlays before the scheduled hearing As of the filing of this notice
27
Defendant has not been served with any opposition to the Demurrer nor does the Court s website indicate
28
1
DEFENDANT RINGO BANGALAN D D S S NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT OF OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO
PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
lfles 2214 tdic Ipleadings p docx
n odeh ntc of non receipt oi
opp to demurrer
1 that any such opposition has been filed
2 Failure to oppose a motion that is duly noticed antl brought on for hearing in anj action makes the
3 motion itself an uncontested proceeding Roonev v Vermontinv Com 10 Cal 3d 351 367 1973 The
4 effect of a party s failure to oppose a motion or a demurrer is to deem the moving papers meritorious and grant
5 the motion See Sexton v Sup Ct Mullikin Med Ctr 58 Cal App 4th 1403 1410 1997 Under such
6 circumstances the Court shoultl refuse to hear oral arguments from Plaintiff the party who failed to oppose
7 the Demurrer
8 Basetl on the absence of a written opposition to the Demurrer Defendant Ringo Bangalan D D S
9 hereby respectfully requests that the Court sustain the Demurrer with respect to Plaintiff s First Amended
10 Verified Complaint
11
12 DATED June 10 2019 PETERSON BRADFORD BURKWITZ
F
N
Y
Q
g
N
13
14
o BY
Thomas R Bradfortl Esq
o 15
Sherry Gregorio Esq
L Y
16 Alexa L Halloran Esq
o Z Attorney for Defendant
wo 17 RINGO BANGALAN D D S
w
a
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
i
28
2
i
DEFENDANT RINGO BANGALAN D D S S NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT OF OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO
PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED VERIFIEQ COMPLAINT
n lfles 2214 odeh tdic Ipleadingslp nic of non receipt of
opp to demurrer docx
Document Filed Date
June 11, 2019
Case Filing Date
September 11, 2018
Category
Medical Malpractice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
i L 1 Thomas R Bradford Esq Bar No 110230 Sherry Gregorio Esq Bar No 263856 su io cc k Gf CALIF t RNlA 2 Alexa L Halloran Esq Bar No 315470 cout rv m rvA mNo S 8 r rRicr PETERSON BRADFORD BURKWITZ 3 100 North First Street Suite 300 JUN 11 il Lr Burbank Califomia 91502 4 818 562 5800 5 Attorneys for Defendant Deputy RINGO BANGALAN D D S 6 7 g SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA g COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 Ali Odeh Case No CIVDS1823772 11 Assigned to the Honorable Wilfred J Schneider Jr 12 Plaintiff Dept S32 0 13 vs DEFENDANT RINGO BANGALAN D D S S N NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF S m 14 Lyngadlen Fernandez DDS Suarez Fernandez OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO FIRST @o Dentistry and Ringo Bangalan DDS AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT o o o 15 Defendants Hearing Date June 19 2019 m L 16 Time 8 30 a m Dept S32 o Z m w 17 18 First Amended Compiaint December 21 2018 g Complaint Filed September 11 2018 i 20 TO THE COURT ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 21 i PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Ringo Bangalan D D S received no opposition to his j 22 Demurrer to Plaintiff s First Amentled Verified Complaint The Demurrer was served on Plaintiff s counsel 23 and thereafter filed with the Court on May 13 2019 The hearing on the Demurrer is scheduled to be heard 24 on June 19 2019 at 8 30 a m in Department S32 25 Under California Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 b Plaintiff s opposition to the tlemurrer was 26 due on June 6 2019 nine 9 court tlays before the scheduled hearing As of the filing of this notice 27 Defendant has not been served with any opposition to the Demurrer nor does the Court s website indicate 28 1 DEFENDANT RINGO BANGALAN D D S S NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT OF OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT lfles 2214 tdic Ipleadings p docx n odeh ntc of non receipt oi opp to demurrer 1 that any such opposition has been filed 2 Failure to oppose a motion that is duly noticed antl brought on for hearing in anj action makes the 3 motion itself an uncontested proceeding Roonev v Vermontinv Com 10 Cal 3d 351 367 1973 The 4 effect of a party s failure to oppose a motion or a demurrer is to deem the moving papers meritorious and grant 5 the motion See Sexton v Sup Ct Mullikin Med Ctr 58 Cal App 4th 1403 1410 1997 Under such 6 circumstances the Court shoultl refuse to hear oral arguments from Plaintiff the party who failed to oppose 7 the Demurrer 8 Basetl on the absence of a written opposition to the Demurrer Defendant Ringo Bangalan D D S 9 hereby respectfully requests that the Court sustain the Demurrer with respect to Plaintiff s First Amended 10 Verified Complaint 11 12 DATED June 10 2019 PETERSON BRADFORD BURKWITZ F N Y Q g N 13 14 o BY Thomas R Bradfortl Esq o 15 Sherry Gregorio Esq L Y 16 Alexa L Halloran Esq o Z Attorney for Defendant wo 17 RINGO BANGALAN D D S w a 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 i 28 2 i DEFENDANT RINGO BANGALAN D D S S NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT OF OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED VERIFIEQ COMPLAINT n lfles 2214 odeh tdic Ipleadingslp nic of non receipt of opp to demurrer docx