On September 11, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bradbury D.D.S., Michael G,
Bradbury, Rhonda,
Odeh, Ali,
and
Cohan, Kat,
Odeh, Ali,
Fernandez D.D.S, Lyngladen,
Fernandez Dds, Lyngladen,
Kingsley Dentistry,
Kingsly Dentistry,
Lyngadlen Fernandez Dds,
Lyngladen Fernandez D.D.S.,
Ringo Bangalan Dds,
Silagan-Fernandez D.D.S., Lyngadlen,
Suarez-Fernandez Dentistry,
Suarez Fernandez Dentistry And Ringo Bangalan, Dds,
for Medical Malpractice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
s
r
4 r
SUPERfORCAU tT
C
pA NIA
1 Jerry S Aki ta S BN 13 0 643 AN ERNAaD
LAVd OFFICF OF JERRY S KITA
WO D STk LT
2 32158 Camino Capistrano Ste A 194 d z i9
San Juan Capistrano CA 92675
949 248 1021
r o
B
aoR k R
4 Attorneys for Defendant U ury
LYNGLADEN FERNANDF 7 D D S
5 Individually and dba KiNGSI Y D NTISTRY Incorrectly named
as LYNGADLEN T rRNANDEI SUAR Z FERNANDE7 DEN I IS1 RY
6
7
8
SUPI IZIOR COURT OF Tl STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN QERN IRDINO
10
11 ALI ODEH CASE NO CIVDS1823772
12 I laintiff ASSIGNED FOR ALL PtJRPOSES 1 O
JUDGE WILFRED J SCHNEIDER JR
1 v DEPARTMF NT S32
14 Lyngadlen Fernandez Kingsly Uentistry NO TICE OF OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
and Does 1 through l0 SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF IN SUPPORT
15 OF MOT ONS FOR
De fendants 1 DISCOVERY SANCTIONS AGAINST
16 DEFrNDANTS UNDERC C P 2023 030
TOR SIJBMISSION OF SUSPECTED
17 FORGED DOCUMEN I S FOR T HE SUM Ot
15 000 AG I INST ALL DEFENDANTS
l 8 AND THFIR ATTORNEYS JOlN1 LY AND
SF VCRALLY
19 2 MOTION OR RE INSTATEMF N f OI
PUNITiVE DAMAG S AGAINST
20 DEFF NDANTS AND
3 MOTION FOR TERMINATING
21 SANCTION UNDER C GP 2023 030 IN
I AVOR OF PLAINTIFF
2
DATE September 23 2019
2 TIME 8 30
I EPT i2
24
Comp aint Filerf 9 11 2018
25
6 COMFS NOW Defendant L YNGLADEN k ERNANDE L D D S Individually and
27 dba KINGSLY DENI ISTRY with the following objections to the Evidence ii Exhibits a d
28
NOTICG OP OBJCCTIONS OF DEFENDANT LYNGLADEN I CRNANDCZ D D S AND KINGSLY
DENTfS I RY TO PLAIN fIFF S MOTIONS I OR SANCTIONS AND PUNITIVE DnMAGF S
1 Declarations submitted by plaintiff in Support of Motions for Sanctions and to Reinstate
2 Punitive Damagcs
Material Objected Io Ob jecti ons Rulin
4 In tlze Declurution or Va su Improper Sustained
1 expert opinion
Vijuyr aghavun a on p 12 a Evidence Code 720 fails to Overruled
6
lines 9 ll qualify as an expert rcgarding
Upon the return of said RFA s documents and electronic records
g
duly filled out and verified by my
9
client to me we ascertained that
10
the Root Canal Informed Consent
the subject of one of the questions
12
had been blatantly manipulated
13
4
2 I the Decl rrc tiof of Va su Improper expert opinion Sustained
15
VijayraKhavan ut on page 12 a Evidence Code 720 fails to Overruled
16
jjn s 12 und 13 qualify as an expert regarding
Upon closer scrutiny it was documents and electronic records
g
discovered that this form was not a
19 machine generated document but
20
had been word processed and that
Mr Odeh Lara s signature apposed
22
manuallv
23
24
25
26
28
3 Declarution o Vuszr Imp rop er ex ert o inion Sustained
NOTIC6 O OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT I YNGLADF N FERNANDEZ D D S AND KINGSI Y
DENTISTRY I O PL 1tNTIFF S MOTIOVS FOR SnNCTIONS 1ND PUNI IVG DAMAG S
Document Filed Date
September 09, 2019
Case Filing Date
September 11, 2018
Category
Medical Malpractice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
s r 4 r SUPERfORCAU tT C pA NIA 1 Jerry S Aki ta S BN 13 0 643 AN ERNAaD LAVd OFFICF OF JERRY S KITA WO D STk LT 2 32158 Camino Capistrano Ste A 194 d z i9 San Juan Capistrano CA 92675 949 248 1021 r o B aoR k R 4 Attorneys for Defendant U ury LYNGLADEN FERNANDF 7 D D S 5 Individually and dba KiNGSI Y D NTISTRY Incorrectly named as LYNGADLEN T rRNANDEI SUAR Z FERNANDE7 DEN I IS1 RY 6 7 8 SUPI IZIOR COURT OF Tl STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN QERN IRDINO 10 11 ALI ODEH CASE NO CIVDS1823772 12 I laintiff ASSIGNED FOR ALL PtJRPOSES 1 O JUDGE WILFRED J SCHNEIDER JR 1 v DEPARTMF NT S32 14 Lyngadlen Fernandez Kingsly Uentistry NO TICE OF OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE and Does 1 through l0 SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF IN SUPPORT 15 OF MOT ONS FOR De fendants 1 DISCOVERY SANCTIONS AGAINST 16 DEFrNDANTS UNDERC C P 2023 030 TOR SIJBMISSION OF SUSPECTED 17 FORGED DOCUMEN I S FOR T HE SUM Ot 15 000 AG I INST ALL DEFENDANTS l 8 AND THFIR ATTORNEYS JOlN1 LY AND SF VCRALLY 19 2 MOTION OR RE INSTATEMF N f OI PUNITiVE DAMAG S AGAINST 20 DEFF NDANTS AND 3 MOTION FOR TERMINATING 21 SANCTION UNDER C GP 2023 030 IN I AVOR OF PLAINTIFF 2 DATE September 23 2019 2 TIME 8 30 I EPT i2 24 Comp aint Filerf 9 11 2018 25 6 COMFS NOW Defendant L YNGLADEN k ERNANDE L D D S Individually and 27 dba KINGSLY DENI ISTRY with the following objections to the Evidence ii Exhibits a d 28 NOTICG OP OBJCCTIONS OF DEFENDANT LYNGLADEN I CRNANDCZ D D S AND KINGSLY DENTfS I RY TO PLAIN fIFF S MOTIONS I OR SANCTIONS AND PUNITIVE DnMAGF S 1 Declarations submitted by plaintiff in Support of Motions for Sanctions and to Reinstate 2 Punitive Damagcs Material Objected Io Ob jecti ons Rulin 4 In tlze Declurution or Va su Improper Sustained 1 expert opinion Vijuyr aghavun a on p 12 a Evidence Code 720 fails to Overruled 6 lines 9 ll qualify as an expert rcgarding Upon the return of said RFA s documents and electronic records g duly filled out and verified by my 9 client to me we ascertained that 10 the Root Canal Informed Consent the subject of one of the questions 12 had been blatantly manipulated 13 4 2 I the Decl rrc tiof of Va su Improper expert opinion Sustained 15 VijayraKhavan ut on page 12 a Evidence Code 720 fails to Overruled 16 jjn s 12 und 13 qualify as an expert regarding Upon closer scrutiny it was documents and electronic records g discovered that this form was not a 19 machine generated document but 20 had been word processed and that Mr Odeh Lara s signature apposed 22 manuallv 23 24 25 26 28 3 Declarution o Vuszr Imp rop er ex ert o inion Sustained NOTIC6 O OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT I YNGLADF N FERNANDEZ D D S AND KINGSI Y DENTISTRY I O PL 1tNTIFF S MOTIOVS FOR SnNCTIONS 1ND PUNI IVG DAMAG S