On September 11, 2018 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bradbury D.D.S., Michael G,
Bradbury, Rhonda,
Odeh, Ali,
and
Cohan, Kat,
Odeh, Ali,
Fernandez D.D.S, Lyngladen,
Fernandez Dds, Lyngladen,
Kingsley Dentistry,
Kingsly Dentistry,
Lyngadlen Fernandez Dds,
Lyngladen Fernandez D.D.S.,
Ringo Bangalan Dds,
Silagan-Fernandez D.D.S., Lyngadlen,
Suarez-Fernandez Dentistry,
Suarez Fernandez Dentistry And Ringo Bangalan, Dds,
for Medical Malpractice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
Thomas R. Brad 3 Esq wy»D
r No.
Sheny TOYO! Bai SUPERIOR Coy
Alexa L. ey . Bar No. 315679 UNT iF IRT OF Cat LIFORNIA
PETE: RADFO
SAN RERNASDINy >ERN, IARDINO
BURNT. DISTRICT
8
199 No ‘3 1 &
a9 451h
DEC 02 2029
4 R18i
BY
$ for Defendan ASETH GOMEZ
GO BANGAI Do ‘BEBUTY
8
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY GF SAN BERNARDINO
1G
1
Al Odett Case No CHD SIS2sr72
12 Assigned to th lonorable: Witred d. Schneider, Jr
Nt [Dept $32]
13
Sm 8
VS. OTICE CF NON RECEIPT OF BLAINTIFE'S
OBFOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR
4 Lynigadien Femandez; Suarez-Fernandez SUMMARY JUDGMENT
a5 Dentistry and Ringo Bangalan, QOS
18 Defendants December 2, 2 eu)
on
B30
o
an.
“7 D 4
>a
us
18
Complaint Fisd: September 11, 2088
at Ai
1 JO THE COURT 48 WELL AS ALL PARTNES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
a2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant RINGO BANGALAN, D.D.83 Motion
far Summary Judgmenf |
2) |] 1S scheduled 10 de heard on Denernber 2, 2020, As such, sursuant to Codeof CS | Procad ABTolSHfOs
24 he deatiling for Plaintiff, Ali Odeh, te serve ang fk ieayay y oppreit was Novem! > 2028, As of the fling
a foe, Dafendart, Dr. Bangalan, has nol been asived wiih any apposition to his Motion, nar dees
the
ust’s docket indicate that ary auch oppo: y has bes
1aS been fik i Failure fo oppose a motion that ls duly agticed
2 : and brought for hear ff fan] act akes the motion self an uncontested proceeding.” Reo! ey
vy
28 | Vermont inv. Com. (1973) 40 Cal 36281, 287
. ~~
OTICE OF NO! OF Pi TIERS GpPOSTIONTO DEFENDANT'S ROTION FOR SURMARY AIDGMENT
sie ot SNe iM
Document Filed Date
December 02, 2020
Case Filing Date
September 11, 2018
Category
Medical Malpractice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Thomas R. Brad 3 Esq wy»D r No. Sheny TOYO! Bai SUPERIOR Coy Alexa L. ey . Bar No. 315679 UNT iF IRT OF Cat LIFORNIA PETE: RADFO SAN RERNASDINy >ERN, IARDINO BURNT. DISTRICT 8 199 No ‘3 1 & a9 451h DEC 02 2029 4 R18i BY $ for Defendan ASETH GOMEZ GO BANGAI Do ‘BEBUTY 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY GF SAN BERNARDINO 1G 1 Al Odett Case No CHD SIS2sr72 12 Assigned to th lonorable: Witred d. Schneider, Jr Nt [Dept $32] 13 Sm 8 VS. OTICE CF NON RECEIPT OF BLAINTIFE'S OBFOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR 4 Lynigadien Femandez; Suarez-Fernandez SUMMARY JUDGMENT a5 Dentistry and Ringo Bangalan, QOS 18 Defendants December 2, 2 eu) on B30 o an. “7 D 4 >a us 18 Complaint Fisd: September 11, 2088 at Ai 1 JO THE COURT 48 WELL AS ALL PARTNES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: a2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant RINGO BANGALAN, D.D.83 Motion far Summary Judgmenf | 2) |] 1S scheduled 10 de heard on Denernber 2, 2020, As such, sursuant to Codeof CS | Procad ABTolSHfOs 24 he deatiling for Plaintiff, Ali Odeh, te serve ang fk ieayay y oppreit was Novem! > 2028, As of the fling a foe, Dafendart, Dr. Bangalan, has nol been asived wiih any apposition to his Motion, nar dees the ust’s docket indicate that ary auch oppo: y has bes 1aS been fik i Failure fo oppose a motion that ls duly agticed 2 : and brought for hear ff fan] act akes the motion self an uncontested proceeding.” Reo! ey vy 28 | Vermont inv. Com. (1973) 40 Cal 36281, 287 . ~~ OTICE OF NO! OF Pi TIERS GpPOSTIONTO DEFENDANT'S ROTION FOR SURMARY AIDGMENT sie ot SNe iM