arrow left
arrow right
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
  • ODEH -V- FERNANDEZ Print Medical Malpractice Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

V ©RH®M V .4 Thomas R. Bradford, Esq., Bar No.: 110230 Sherry Gregorio, Esq., Bar No.: 263856 Alexa L. Halloran, Esq., Bar No.: 315470 PETERSON BRADFORD BURKWITZ @ - - 100 North First Street, Suite 300 . Burbank, California 91502 . ": '2, é: m . SUPERDR C5}; g, f;m.»r-0RNIA 818562-5800 AttorneysforDefendant éfiflfix NOV 2. 5 2.329 (DWNGU'IAOON RINGO BANGALAN, D.D.S. h “swagw/ BY 1'.-. a La .‘.- nwmyu.“ EKFAEL H&Hs'w «mi, DEPUTY SUPERIOR COURT 0F THE STATE 0F CALIFORNIA \ COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINo Ali Odeh Case No.: CIVDS1823772 Assigned to the Honorable: Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr Plaintiff, [Dept 832] BURKWITZ 300 91502 vs. NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT 0F PLAINTIFF’S Suite - OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR Street, Lyngadlen Fernandez; DDS; Suarez-Fernandez SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRADFORD California 818.562.5800 Dentistry and Ringo Bangalan, DDS First - Defendants. Date: December 2, 2020 Burbank, North Time: 8:30am. PETERSON 100 Dept: 832 Complaint Filed: September 1 1, 2018 mflmmhww—‘OQDmNmm-AWNAO NNMNNMNNNAAAAAAAAAA T0 THE COURT AS WELL AS ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant RiNGO BANGALAN, D.D.S.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is scheduled to be heard on December 2, 2020. As such, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 437c(b)(2), the deadline for Plaintiff, Ali Odeh, to serve and file any opposition was November 18, 2020. As of the filing of this notice, Defendant, Dr. Bangalan, has not been served with any opposition to his Motion, nor does the Court's docket indicate that any such opposition has been "Failure to filed. oppose a motion that is duly noticed and brought on for hearing in [an] action makes the motion itself an uncontested proceeding." Rooney v. Vermont lnv. Corg. (1973) 10 Cal. 3d 351, 367. 1 NOTICE 0F NON RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT n:\fi|es\2214-odeh (tdic)\pleadings\msj\p-not non opp msj.docx V V Based on the foregoing, Defendant provides this Notice to the Court. DATED: N0vember25, 2020 PETERSON BRADFORD BURKWITZ - - ©WNO§U1#OOMA /s/ Thomas R. Bradford By: Thomas R. Bradford, Esq. Sherry Gregorio, Esq. Alexa L. Halloran, Esq. Attorney for Defendant \ RINGO BANGALAN, D.D.S. BURKWITZ 300 91502 Suite - Street, California BRADFORD 818.562.5800 First - North Burbank, PETERSON 100 mNmCfiAmN—kommNmU‘l-hOON—‘O NNNMNNNNNAAAAAAAAAA 2 NOTICE OF NON RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION T0 DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT n:\files\2214-odeh (tdic)\pleadings\msj\p—not non opp msj.docx