arrow left
arrow right
  • ARA KIUPELIAN, ET AL. VS GEORGE GEMAYEL, ET AL. Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ARA KIUPELIAN, ET AL. VS GEORGE GEMAYEL, ET AL. Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/20/2021 11:50 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. So,Deputy Clerk James A. Shalvoy SBN 129503 1219 Morningside Drive Manhattan Beach,'A 90266 Tel 310-796-0447 Fax 310-796-0447 'amesashalvo rmail.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Ara Kiupelian and Vardan Kiupelian SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARA KIUPELIAN, an individual; ) Case No. 19STCV21444 10 VARDAN KIUPELIAN, an individual, ) ) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO Plaintiffs, ) DEFENDANTS GEORGE GKMAYKL ) AND GREKNKRAFT, INC.'S MOTION 12 V. ) FOR ATTORNEYS'EES AND COSTS / ) 13 GREENKRAFT, INC., a California ) Date: October 29, 2021 corporation; GEORGE GEMAYEL, an ) Time 8:30 a.m. 14 individual; DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive, ) Dept. 56 ) 15 Defendants ) Complaint Filed: June 19, 2019 16 Trial Date: July 11, 2022 Assigned for all 17 purposes to: Hon. Holly J. Fujie 18 Plaintiffs Ara Kiupelian and Vardan Kiupelian (collectively "plaintiffs" ) herein file 19 these evidentiary,:objections to evidence submitted in support of defendants George Gemayel 20 ("Gemayel") and Greenkraft, Inc.'s ("Greenkraft") (collectively "defendants"): (1) motion for 21 attorney's fees and costs (the "Motion" ); and (2) reply in support of motion for attorneys'ees and 22 costs (" Reply" ). 23 Objection Number I to Evidence in Support of Motion 24 Document obj ecte'd to: Declaration of Mare Lazo 25 Location of material objected to: Page 9 of Motion, para. 6, lines 15-16. 26 Objectionable Statement: "Attached hereto as Exhibit '1's a true and correct copy of 27 28 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS'OTION FOR ATTORNEYS* FEES AND COSTS