On August 14, 2020 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Stephens, Donnetta,
and
Crown Ace Hardware,
Does 1 Through 100 Inclusive,
Monsato Company,
Wilbur-Ellis Company, Llc,
Wilbur-Ellis Nutrition, Llc,
for Product Liability Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
\v
F l
Paul R. Kiesel (CA SBN 119854) sggetgggngN or CD MT
KIESEL LAW LLP SAN BERNARDINBO
EngAT%?'~d
8648 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 9021 1-2910 JUL 01 202!
Tel: 310-854-4444
Fax: 310-854-0812 By 7M.
kiesel@kiesel.1aw
\OOO\lO\mJ>UJN>—d
DEPUT‘
Fletcher V. Trammell, Esq. Alexander G. Dwyer
Melissa Binstock Ephron, Esq. Andrew F. Kirkendall
TRAMMELL, PC Erin M. Wood
3262 Westheimer Rd., Ste. 423 KIRKENDALL DWYER LLP
Houston, TX 77098 4343 Sigma Rd, Suite 200
Tel: (800) 405-1740 Dallas, TX 75244
Fax: (800) 532-0992 Tel: 214-271-4027
fletch@trammellpc.com Fax: 214-253-0629
melissa@trammellpc.com ad@kirkendalldwyer.com
ak@kirkendalldwyer.com
p—tp—AH—nr—I
AwN—‘O
Attorneysfor Plaintifl ewood@kirkendalldwyer.com
DONNETTA STEPHENS
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE 0F CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
gr"
v.
‘1.
u».4W:
‘11,: n
DONNETTA STEPHENS, Case N0. CIVSBZ 104801
«“T‘ri’
Plaintiff AssignedforAll Pmposes t0 the Hon. Gilbert
W
G. Ochoa, Dept. S24
VS.
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION
AND MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO
MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., EXCLUDE ANY TESTIMONY,
EVIDENCE, OR ARGUMENT OF
Defendants. MONOGRAPHS OTHER THAN
MONOGRAPH 112
Department: $24
Judge: Hon. Gilbert G. Ochoa
Hearing Date: TBD
Time: TBD
Complaint Filed: August 14, 2020
2021
Trial Date: July 19,
1
Motion 1n Limine No 9 T0 Exclude Any Testimony, Evidence, or Argument of Monographs
Other Than Monograph 112
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, at a date and time set by the above-entitled Court, located
at 247 W. 3m Street, San Bernardino, California 92415, Plaintiff Donnetta Stephens (“Plaintiff”)
will and hereby does move in limine to exclude evidence, testimony, or argument regarding
\OWNONUI-bUJNp—n
Monographs other than Monograph 1 12.
This motion in limine has been brought pursuant to Cal. Evid. Code §§ 350 and 352 and is
based on the grounds that such evidence is inadmissible, because such evidence is not relevant or,
alternatively, that any probative value this evidence might have is substantially outweighed by the
prejudicial impact.
This motion in limine is based on this notice of motion, the motion and accompanying
memorandum ofpoints and authorities, the concurrently filed Declaration 0f Fletcher V. Trammell,
the concurrently filed proposed order, all pleadings and papers on file in this matter, and such further
oral and documentary evidence and papers as the Court may consider at the time of the hearing.
Dated: July 1, 2021
NNNNNNNNNr—dy—tr—dp—dp—tr—IHHp—tr—d
OO\IO\KJIJ>UJNHO\OOONO\KIIAUJN'—‘O
By:
Fletcher V. Trammell
Melissa Binstock Ephron
TRAMMELL, PC
3262 Westheimer Rd., Ste. 423
Houston, TX 77098
Tel: (800) 405-1740
Fax: (800) 532-0992
fletch axtrammcll c.com
melissaaitrammellpc.com
Paul R. Kiesel
KIESEL LAW LLP
8648 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 9021 1-2910
Tel: 310-854-4444
Fax: 310-854-0812
2
Motion in Limine N0. 9 To Exclude Any Testimony, Evidence, or Argument of Monographs
Other Than Monograph 1 12
Document Filed Date
July 01, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 14, 2020
Category
Product Liability Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.