arrow left
arrow right
  • Stephens -v- Monsanto Company, et al Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
  • Stephens -v- Monsanto Company, et al Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
  • Stephens -v- Monsanto Company, et al Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
  • Stephens -v- Monsanto Company, et al Print Product Liability Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

\v F l Paul R. Kiesel (CA SBN 119854) sggetgggngN or CD MT KIESEL LAW LLP SAN BERNARDINBO EngAT%?'~d 8648 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, California 9021 1-2910 JUL 01 202! Tel: 310-854-4444 Fax: 310-854-0812 By 7M. kiesel@kiesel.1aw \OOO\lO\mJ>UJN>—d DEPUT‘ Fletcher V. Trammell, Esq. Alexander G. Dwyer Melissa Binstock Ephron, Esq. Andrew F. Kirkendall TRAMMELL, PC Erin M. Wood 3262 Westheimer Rd., Ste. 423 KIRKENDALL DWYER LLP Houston, TX 77098 4343 Sigma Rd, Suite 200 Tel: (800) 405-1740 Dallas, TX 75244 Fax: (800) 532-0992 Tel: 214-271-4027 fletch@trammellpc.com Fax: 214-253-0629 melissa@trammellpc.com ad@kirkendalldwyer.com ak@kirkendalldwyer.com p—tp—AH—nr—I AwN—‘O Attorneysfor Plaintifl ewood@kirkendalldwyer.com DONNETTA STEPHENS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO gr" v. ‘1. u».4W: ‘11,: n DONNETTA STEPHENS, Case N0. CIVSBZ 104801 «“T‘ri’ Plaintiff AssignedforAll Pmposes t0 the Hon. Gilbert W G. Ochoa, Dept. S24 VS. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., EXCLUDE ANY TESTIMONY, EVIDENCE, OR ARGUMENT OF Defendants. MONOGRAPHS OTHER THAN MONOGRAPH 112 Department: $24 Judge: Hon. Gilbert G. Ochoa Hearing Date: TBD Time: TBD Complaint Filed: August 14, 2020 2021 Trial Date: July 19, 1 Motion 1n Limine No 9 T0 Exclude Any Testimony, Evidence, or Argument of Monographs Other Than Monograph 112 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, at a date and time set by the above-entitled Court, located at 247 W. 3m Street, San Bernardino, California 92415, Plaintiff Donnetta Stephens (“Plaintiff”) will and hereby does move in limine to exclude evidence, testimony, or argument regarding \OWNONUI-bUJNp—n Monographs other than Monograph 1 12. This motion in limine has been brought pursuant to Cal. Evid. Code §§ 350 and 352 and is based on the grounds that such evidence is inadmissible, because such evidence is not relevant or, alternatively, that any probative value this evidence might have is substantially outweighed by the prejudicial impact. This motion in limine is based on this notice of motion, the motion and accompanying memorandum ofpoints and authorities, the concurrently filed Declaration 0f Fletcher V. Trammell, the concurrently filed proposed order, all pleadings and papers on file in this matter, and such further oral and documentary evidence and papers as the Court may consider at the time of the hearing. Dated: July 1, 2021 NNNNNNNNNr—dy—tr—dp—dp—tr—IHHp—tr—d OO\IO\KJIJ>UJNHO\OOONO\KIIAUJN'—‘O By: Fletcher V. Trammell Melissa Binstock Ephron TRAMMELL, PC 3262 Westheimer Rd., Ste. 423 Houston, TX 77098 Tel: (800) 405-1740 Fax: (800) 532-0992 fletch axtrammcll c.com melissaaitrammellpc.com Paul R. Kiesel KIESEL LAW LLP 8648 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, California 9021 1-2910 Tel: 310-854-4444 Fax: 310-854-0812 2 Motion in Limine N0. 9 To Exclude Any Testimony, Evidence, or Argument of Monographs Other Than Monograph 1 12