On July 25, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Catalan Morales Josefina,
Pineda Rojas Froylan Aka Froylan Pineda,
and
Nissan North America Inc. A California Corporation,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/10/2021 11:15 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Steve Mikhov (SBN 224676)/Amy Morse (SBN 290502)
KNIGHT LAW GROUP, LLP
10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500, Los Angeles, CA 90067
TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 552-2250 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 552-7973
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): amym@knightlaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs, Froylan Pineda Rojas aka Froylan Pineda, et al.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Froylan Pineda Rojas aka Froylan Pineda, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Nissan North America, Inc.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): ✔ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 19STCV26034
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: March 25, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 40 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. ✔ This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs, Froylan Pineda Rojas aka Froylan Pineda, et al.
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): July 25, 2019
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. ✔ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in ✔ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
See attachment 4a.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
March 10, 2021
Case Filing Date
July 25, 2019
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 01/07/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.