On October 08, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wu An Individual Alpha,
and
Daruma Ventures Inc. A Corporation,
Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive,
Fujioka An Individual Robb,
for Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/23/2020 05:42 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by T. Rhodes,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
BLANK ROME LLP
Cheryl S. Chang (SBN 237098); Nicole B. Metral (SBN 286606)
2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
TELEPHONE NO.: (424) 239-3400 FAX NO. (Optional): (424) 239-3434
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Chang@BlankRome.com; nbmetral@BlankRome.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff ALPHA WU
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 825 Maple Ave.
MAILING ADDRESS: 825 Maple Ave.
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Torrance, CA 90503
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ALPHA WU
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DARUMA VENTURES, INC., et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
19TRCV00902
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 2/7/2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: B Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff ALPHA WU
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): October 8, 2019
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
The Complaint asserts causes of action for: (1) breach of promissory note; (2) breach of guaranty; (3) common
count - account stated; and (4) writ of attachment.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
Document Filed Date
January 23, 2020
Case Filing Date
October 08, 2019
Category
Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Stipulated Judgment - Before Trial 06/18/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.