arrow left
arrow right
  • ALPHA WU, AN INDIVIDUAL VS DARUMA VENTURES, INC. A CORPORATION, ET AL. Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ALPHA WU, AN INDIVIDUAL VS DARUMA VENTURES, INC. A CORPORATION, ET AL. Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/23/2020 05:42 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by T. Rhodes,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY BLANK ROME LLP Cheryl S. Chang (SBN 237098); Nicole B. Metral (SBN 286606) 2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 TELEPHONE NO.: (424) 239-3400 FAX NO. (Optional): (424) 239-3434 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Chang@BlankRome.com; nbmetral@BlankRome.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff ALPHA WU SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 825 Maple Ave. MAILING ADDRESS: 825 Maple Ave. CITY AND ZIP CODE: Torrance, CA 90503 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ALPHA WU DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DARUMA VENTURES, INC., et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: 19TRCV00902 (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 2/7/2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: B Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff ALPHA WU b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): October 8, 2019 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): The Complaint asserts causes of action for: (1) breach of promissory note; (2) breach of guaranty; (3) common count - account stated; and (4) writ of attachment. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com