On August 30, 2012 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx,
Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx,
and
Berlin Obgyn Associates,
Family Psychology Of Long Island,
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. K N A Ortho-Mcneil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Richard Pitch,
Ronald J Tadeo,
Scott Berlin,
Shore Psychiatric Center,
Zydus Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.,
for Tort
in the District Court of Suffolk County.
Preview
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/25/2023 10:41 AM INDEX NO. 026910/2012
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 215 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
xxxxxx xxxxxxxx, on behalf of xxxxx
xxxxxxxx, an infant under the age of 18, and Index No. 26910/2012
xxxxxx xxxxxxxx, Individually,
SUPPLEMENTAL
Plaintiff,
AFFIRMATION
-against-
RONALD J. TADDEO, M.D., RICHARD PITCH,
M.D., SCOTT BERLIN, M.D., SHORE PSYCHIATRIC
CENTER, FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY OF LONG
ISLAND, BERLIN OBGYN ASSOCIATES, JANSSEN
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and ZYDUS
PHARMACEUTICALS (USA), INC.,
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
1. xxxxxx xxxxxxx, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the Courts of the
State of New York, hereby affirms the following to be true under the penalties of perjury:
2. I am a partner with NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLC, attorneys for the plaintiff,
and based on my review of the file I am familiar with the facts and circumstances of this
matter.
3. I make this affirmation in as a supplement to clarify statements made in the
Affirmation in Support of Plaintiff’s Order to Show Cause filed on May 24, 2023.
4. Specifically, in Affirmation, Plaintiff’s Supplemental Bill of Particulars was
referenced and was annexed as an Exhibit (at Exhibit C, with the original Bill of Particulars).
Your affirmant left off the ongoing motion practice regarding same.
1 of 3
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/25/2023 10:41 AM INDEX NO. 026910/2012
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 215 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2023
5. The Defendants objected to the Supplemental Bill of Particulars and filed a
Motion to Strike same, which can be found on the NYSCEF at docket nos. 155 through 162.
Plaintiff opposed the motion (NYSCEF doc 164) and the Defendants replied (dkt no. 165).
6. Defendants’ Motion to Strike was granted in a Decision and Order by Justice
Baisley, which can be found a NYSCEF docket number 167 and is also Annexed hereto at
Exhibit E. In the Decision, Justice Baisley held that the Supplemental Bill of Particulars was
instead an amended Bill of Particulars.
7. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal on March 10, 2023 (dkt. No 169) as well as an
Order to Show Cause to amend the Bill of Particulars (dkt 170-179) which was signed by
Justuce Baisley on March 15, 2023 (dkt 181). The Order to Show cause was opposed by
defendants on March 31, 2023 (dkt 181-189). Plaintiff submitted a reply on April 4, 2023. The
Order to Show Cause remains pending.
8. Your affirmant respectfully submits this affirmation to ensure that the
procedural history of this matter is clear to this Court.
Dated: May 25, 2023
Melville, New York
Yours, etc.,
NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLC
_____________________________
xxxxxx L. xxxxxxx
Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
400 Broadhollow Road – Suite 305
Melville, NY 11747
212-397-1000
2 of 3
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/25/2023 10:41 AM INDEX NO. 026910/2012
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 215 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2023
3 of 3
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.