Motion,Ex Parte: RUBEN SANTOS MARTINEZ VS JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/23/2021 03:49 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Lopez,Deputy Clerk




                               SCOTT L. MACDONALD, ESQ. (SBN: 171865)
                          1 RORY D. LEOS, ESQ. (SBN: 228161)
                               MACDONALD & CODY, LLP
                          2 28 Executive Park, Third Floor
                               Irvine, California 92614
                          3 Telephone: (714) 831-1713
                               Facsimile: (714) 823-3229
                          4 E-mails: smacdonald@macdonaldcody.com
                                             rleos@macdonaldcody.com
                          5
                               Attorneys for Defendant JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA
                          6
                          7
                          8                                SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                          9                                                      COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                        10 RUBEN SANTOS MARTINEZ, an individual,                                             Case No.: 19STCV39214
                        11                             Plaintiff,                                           [Unlimited Jurisdiction – Exceeds $25,000]
                               v.
                        12                                                                                                Assigned For All Purposes To:
                                                                                                                           Judge Stephen I. Goorvitch
                        13 JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA, an                                                                           Department 32
                               individual, and DOES 1- 10, inclusive,
                        14                                                                                  DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE (#9)
                                                        Defendants.                                         TO EXCLUDE ANY ELECTRONIC
                        15                                                                                  PRESENTATION OF PLAINTIFF’S
                                                                                                            OPENING STATEMENT; MEMORANDUM
                        16                                                                                  OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES;
                                                                                                            [PROPOSED] ORDER
                        17
                                                                                                            MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9
                        18
                                                                                                            [Filed Concurrently with Proposed Order]
                        19
                                                                                                            Complaint Filed: 10/28/2019
                        20                                                                                  Trial Date:      07/29/2021
                        21
                        22                 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:
                        23                 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant, JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA, hereby moves
                        24 this Court in limine for an order precluding the use of any electronic presentation, including but not
                        25 limited to PowerPoint visual aids in Plaintiff’s opening statement.
                        26                 1.          An electronic presentation of the Plaintiff’s opening statement would create undue
                        27                            prejudice, confuse the issues at trial and mislead the jury.
                        28

                                                                         1
                                  DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO EXCLUDE ANY ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION OF
                                                         PLAINTIFF’S OPENING STATEMENT