arrow left
arrow right
  • RUBEN SANTOS MARTINEZ VS JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • RUBEN SANTOS MARTINEZ VS JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/27/2021 04:36 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mohammadi,Deputy Clerk MICHAEL F. MOON, ESQ. (SBN 213975) 1 RAVI K. LALLY, ESQ. (SBN 225687) MACDONALD & CODY, LLP 2 3400 Central Ave., Suite 300 Riverside, California 92506 3 Telephone: (951) 877-3299 Facsimile: (951) 877-3317 4 E-mails: mmoon@macdonaldcody.com rlally@macdonaldcody.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 RUBEN SANTOS MARTINEZ, an individual, Case No.: 19STCV39214 11 Plaintiff, [Unlimited Jurisdiction-Exceeds $25,000.00] v. 12 DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO THE DECLARATION OF AMY MOELTER IN 13 JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA, an SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION individual, and DOES 1- 10, inclusive, FOR NEW TRIAL 14 Defendants. 15 Complaint Filed: 10/28/19 16 Trial Date: 08/09/2021 17 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 18 Defendant, JAVIER AVIEL VALENZUELA submits the following objection to the 19 Declaration Ms. Amy Moelter in Support of Plaintiff, RUBEN SANTOS MARTINEZ’S Motion 20 for New Trial. 21 MATERIAL OBJECTED GROUNDS FOR SUSTAINED/OVERRULED OBJECTION 22 Page 2, Paragraph 3, lines 8 Objection, Evidence Code, Sustained ________ 23 through 9 section 1150(a) as the paragraph seeks to invade the Overruled ________ 24 jury’s mental thought processes, relevance 25 Page 2, Paragraph 4, lines 10 Objection, Evidence Code, Sustained ________ 26 through 11 section 1150(a) as the paragraph seeks to invade the Overruled ________ 27 jury’s mental thought processes, relevance 28 1 DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO THE DECLARATION OF COUNSEL