Motion-Secondary: ALVARO GARCIA VS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP, ET AL.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/20/2021 02:45 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Gonzalez,Deputy Clerk




                  1 MARGARET M. HOLM, State Bar No. 71252
                    mholm@tysonmendes.com
                  2 KRISTINE M. GAMBOA, State Bar No. 299645
                    kgamboa@ tysonmendes.com
                  3 TYSON & MENDES LLP
                    17901 Von Karman, Suite 600
                  4 Irvine, California 92614
                    Telephone: (949 490-4840
                  5 Facsimile: (949) 267-5261

                  6 Attorneys for Defendants, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., BHS -
                    AMERICAN RECOVERY CENTER, RAINER BANSUAN, M.D., SON LE,
                  7 M.D., and TUAN D. NGUYEN, M.D.

                  8                                   SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                  9                                 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, POMONA COURTHOUSE
                10

                11 ALVARO GARCIA, an individual,                                                      Case No. 19STCV45995

                12                            Plaintiff,                                              Assigned for All Purposes to:
                                                                                                      Hon. Thomas C. Falls, Dept. R
                13                 v.
                                                                                                      DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO
                14 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.,                                                  PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL
                   a California Corp.; BHS - AMERICAN                                                 FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL
                15 RECOVERY CENTER, a business form                                                   INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO, AND
                   unknown; RAINER BANSUAN, M.D., an                                                  REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS;
                16 individual; SON LE, M.D., an individual;                                           MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
                   TUAN D. NGUYEN, M.D., an individual; and                                           AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF;
                17 DOES 1-100, inclusive,                                                             DECLARATION OF KRISTINE M.
                                                                                                      GAMBOA
                18                            Defendants.
                                                                                                      Date:                  January 5, 2022
                19                                                                                    Time:                  10:00 a.m.
                                                                                                      Dept.:                 R
                20

                21
                                                                                                      Action Filed:                     December 19, 2019
                22                                                                                    Trial Date:                       August 23, 2022

                23

                24                 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
                25                 COMES NOW Defendant BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.’s (hereinafter
                26       “defendant”), and hereby submits its Opposition to Plaintiff ALVARO GARCIA’s (hereinafter
                27       “plaintiff”) Motion for Order to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Two,
                28       and Request for Sanctions.
                                                                                                  1
                          DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO
                                               SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO