Motion-Secondary: ALAN LABOSSIERE, ET AL. VS BRAILE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC., A CORPORATION

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/16/2021 12:00 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Coreas,Deputy Clerk




                  1             Marc A. Trachtman, Esq. [SBN 167820]
                                Timothy M. Smith, Esq, [SBN 125534]
                  2             TRACHTMAN & TRACHTMAN, LLP
                                19732 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 100
                  3                        Irvine, CA 92612
                                      Telephone: (949) 282-0100
                  4                   Facsimile: (949) 282-0111
                                     tsmith@trachtmanlaw.com
                  5
                         Attorneys for Defendant BRAILLE INSTITUTE
                  6      OF AMERICA, INC. (erroneously sued as BRAILE
                         INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC.)
                  7
                  8
                                                    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                  9
                                                                          COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                10
                11       ALAN LABOSSIERE, individual and as                                      CASE NO.: 19STCV40743
                         a successor in interest to Thelma
                12       Labossiere; ANNETTE LEITZKE,                                            [Assigned for All Purposes to
                                                                                                 Hon. Kristin S. Escalante, Department 29]
                13       individually and as a successor in
                         interest to Thelma Labossiere;
                                                                                                 DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO EX
                14       ESTATE OF LABOSSIERE, by and
                                                                                                 PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
                         through its successors in interest, Alan
                15                                                                               HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY
                         Labossiere and Annette Leitzke;
                                                                                                 JUDGMENT
                16
                                                Plaintiffs,
                17                                                                               [Filed concurrently with Declaration of
                                                                                                 Timothy M. Smith; and [Proposed] Order]
                                    vs.
                18
                                                                                                 DATE:                  February 17, 2021
                19       BRAILE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA,
                                                                                                 TIME:                  8:30 p.m.
                         INC., a corporation; DOES 1 to 50,
                20                                                                               DEPT.:                 29
                         Inclusive,
                21
                                                Defendants.                                      Complaint Filed:  11/12/19
                22                                                                               MSJ Hearing Date: 4/9/2021
                                                                                                 Trial Date:       05/11/21
                23       BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA,
                         INC., a corporation
                24
                                                Cross-complainant,
                25
                                    vs.
                26
                27       ROES 1-25, inclusive,

                28                              Cross-Defendants.


                                                                          -1-
                                              ___________________________________________________________
                                             DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
                                                      HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT