On January 24, 2020 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hogan Mark,
and
City Of Los Angeles,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/05/2020 03:02 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk
CIV-020
ATTORNEY OR PARlY WITHOUT ATTORNEY; STATE BAR NO.: 284834
NAME: Christopher Cadena
FIRM NAME: Cityof Los ~geles, Office of the City Attorney
STREET ADDREss: 200 N. Main St., 7th Floor
c11Y: Los Angeles STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 90012
TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 978-2708 FAXNO.(ifavai/ab/eJ: {213) 978-8216
E-MAILAD• Ress (ifsvaitab1aJ: christopher.cadena@lacity.org
ATTORNEY FOR (name); Defendant City of Los Angeles
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill St.
MAlllNG ADDRESS:
c11Y AND 21? coDE: Los Angeles, 90012
BRANCH NAME: Dept. 24
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Mark Hogan
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: City of Los Angeles
CASE NUMBER:
NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE 20STCV03223
1. Party intending to appear by telephone ls
D Plaintiff/Petitioner (name):
[K] DefendanURespondent (name): City of Los Angeles
D other (name):
2. The conference, hearing, or proceeding is for (describe):
Case Management Conference
set on (date): August 11, 2020 at (time):8:30 a.m. In (department): 24
before (name ofjudicial officer, if known): Judge Patricia D. Nieto
Date: August 5, 2020
Christopher Cadena
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) • (SIGNATURE)
See Code of Civil Procedure section 367.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 3.670 to determine if a conference,
hearing, or proceeding is one generally considered appropriate for telephone appearance. Note that a court may
determine on a hearing-by-hearing basis that a personal appearance is required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 367.5(c).)
This form Is intended only to provide written notice to a court and parties as provided in rule 3.670{h) of the California
Rules of Court. Check with the court to determine how to make arrangements for telephone services for an
appearance either directly with the court or through a court-appointed vendor.
Read California Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h) to determine when you have to file and serve notice of the intent to appear
by telephone. There are different deadlines depending upon the circumstances:
(1) On a regularly noticed hearing, notice must be given at least two court days before the appearance {Cal. Rules of
Court, rule 3.670(h){1 )(B)) or, after receiving notice that another party will be appearing telephonically, by noon on
the court day before the appearance (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h}{2)).
(2) On an ex pa rte application, notice must be given by an applicant by 10:00 a.m. two court days before the hearing
(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(3){B)). Any party other than an applicant may give notice by 2:00 p.m. or the
"close of business" (as that term is defined in rule 2.251) whichever is earlier, on the court day before an ex parte
appearance. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(4).)
Page 1 of1
Form Approved for Optional Use Code or Civil Ptocedure, § 367.S:
Judlc!al Councn or canlomla NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670
CIV-020 (Rev. January 1, 2016]
For your protection and privacy, please press the Clear
This Form button after you have printed the fonn. ,.___
Document Filed Date
August 05, 2020
Case Filing Date
January 24, 2020
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Consolidated (Non-lead case) 04/05/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.