arrow left
arrow right
  • MARK HOGAN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARK HOGAN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/05/2020 03:02 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk CIV-020 ATTORNEY OR PARlY WITHOUT ATTORNEY; STATE BAR NO.: 284834 NAME: Christopher Cadena FIRM NAME: Cityof Los ~geles, Office of the City Attorney STREET ADDREss: 200 N. Main St., 7th Floor c11Y: Los Angeles STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 90012 TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 978-2708 FAXNO.(ifavai/ab/eJ: {213) 978-8216 E-MAILAD• Ress (ifsvaitab1aJ: christopher.cadena@lacity.org ATTORNEY FOR (name); Defendant City of Los Angeles SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill St. MAlllNG ADDRESS: c11Y AND 21? coDE: Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: Dept. 24 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Mark Hogan DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: City of Los Angeles CASE NUMBER: NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE 20STCV03223 1. Party intending to appear by telephone ls D Plaintiff/Petitioner (name): [K] DefendanURespondent (name): City of Los Angeles D other (name): 2. The conference, hearing, or proceeding is for (describe): Case Management Conference set on (date): August 11, 2020 at (time):8:30 a.m. In (department): 24 before (name ofjudicial officer, if known): Judge Patricia D. Nieto Date: August 5, 2020 Christopher Cadena (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) • (SIGNATURE) See Code of Civil Procedure section 367.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 3.670 to determine if a conference, hearing, or proceeding is one generally considered appropriate for telephone appearance. Note that a court may determine on a hearing-by-hearing basis that a personal appearance is required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 367.5(c).) This form Is intended only to provide written notice to a court and parties as provided in rule 3.670{h) of the California Rules of Court. Check with the court to determine how to make arrangements for telephone services for an appearance either directly with the court or through a court-appointed vendor. Read California Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h) to determine when you have to file and serve notice of the intent to appear by telephone. There are different deadlines depending upon the circumstances: (1) On a regularly noticed hearing, notice must be given at least two court days before the appearance {Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h){1 )(B)) or, after receiving notice that another party will be appearing telephonically, by noon on the court day before the appearance (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h}{2)). (2) On an ex pa rte application, notice must be given by an applicant by 10:00 a.m. two court days before the hearing (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(3){B)). Any party other than an applicant may give notice by 2:00 p.m. or the "close of business" (as that term is defined in rule 2.251) whichever is earlier, on the court day before an ex parte appearance. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(4).) Page 1 of1 Form Approved for Optional Use Code or Civil Ptocedure, § 367.S: Judlc!al Councn or canlomla NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670 CIV-020 (Rev. January 1, 2016] For your protection and privacy, please press the Clear This Form button after you have printed the fonn. ,.___