arrow left
arrow right
  • AMANDA KINZ VS CHOL ENTERPRISES INC Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • AMANDA KINZ VS CHOL ENTERPRISES INC Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/20/2019 11:47 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by H. Flores-Hernandez,Deputy Clerk 19STCV41866 Assigned for all purposes to: Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Anthony Mohr DUEL LAW FIRM 1 Jasmine A. Duel | SBN 271872 | jasmine@duellawfirm.com 270 North Cañon Drive, Third Floor 2 Beverly Hills, California 90210 3 P: (310) 975-7095 F: (310) 846-8549 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff AMANDA KINZ 6 7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 9 10 AMANDA KINZ, an individual, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 11 Plaintiff, 1. SEX DISCRIMINATION IN 12 v. VIOLATION OF FEHA; 13 2. SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION IN VIOLATION 14 CHOL ENTERPRISES INC DBA GLOBE OF FEHA; THEATER, and DOES 1-25 15 3. RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF Defendants. FEHA; 16 17 4. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN AN ENVIORNMENT FREE FROM 18 DISCRIMAINTION, RETALIATION, AND 19 HARASSMENT IN VIOLATION OF FEHA; 20 21 5. FAILURE TO PROVIDE REST PERIODS IN VIOLATION OF 22 LABOR CODE §§ 226.7 & 1198; 6. FAILURE TO PROVIDE MEAL 23 PERIODS IN VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE §§ 226.7 & 1198; 24 7. UNPAID WAGES AND OVERTIME 25 IN VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE §§ 510 & 1194 & 1197.1; 26 8. WAITING TIME PENALTIES IN 27 VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE § 203; 28 1 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES