On November 20, 2019 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Second Round Sub Llc Assignee Of Comenity Capital Bank Toyota Credit Card,
and
Solis Marisol V,
for Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/20/2019 02:29 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by D. Santos,Deputy Clerk
VMEDIASTART=FILENO=/3866361~CMT=/CA - SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT 19NWLC45484
CM-010
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Christopher A. Beyer, State Bar #213264
Camryn P. Berk, State Bar #317565
RAUSCH STURM
3131 Camino Del Rio N., Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92108
TELEPHONE NO.: (877) 215-2552 FAX NO.: (877) 396-4464
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFF
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 12720 NORWALK BOULEVARD
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: NORWALK, CA 90650
BRANCH NAME: NORWALK COURTHOUSE
CASE NAME: Second Round Sub, LLC assignee of Comenity Capital Bank (TOYOTA CREDIT CARD) vs. CASE NUMBER:
MARISOL V SOLIS, et al.
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation JUDGE:
 Unlimited  Limited  Counter  Joinder DEPT:
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded Filed with first appearance by defendant
exceeds $25,000) is $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402)
Items 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
1. Check one box below for the case types that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
 Auto (22)  Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400 - 3.403)
 Uninsured motorist (46)  Rule 3.740 collections (09)  Antitrust/Trade regulation (03)
Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/Property  Other Collections (09)  Construction defect (10)
Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort  Insurance coverage (18)  Mass tort (40)
 Asbestos (04)  Other contract (37)  Securities litigation (28)
 Product liability (24) Real Property  Environmental /Toxic tort (30)
 Medical Malpractice (45)  Eminent domain/Inverse  Insurance coverage claims arising from the
 Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case
Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort  Wrongful eviction (33) types (41)
 Business tort/unfair business practice (07)  Other real property (26)
 Civil Rights (08) Unlawful Detainer Enforcement of Judgment
 Defamation (13)  Commercial (31)  Enforcement of judgment (20)
 Fraud (16)  Residential (32) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
 Intellectual Property (19)  Drugs (38)  RICO (27)
 Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review  Other complaint (not specified above) (42)
 Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35)  Asset forfeiture (05) Miscellaneous Civil Petition
Employment  Petition re: arbitration award (11)  Partnership and corporate governance (21)
 Wrongful termination (36)  Writ of mandate (02)  Other petition (not specified above) (43)
 Other employment (15)  Other judicial review (39)
2. This case  is  is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring
exceptional judicial management:
a.  Large number of separately represented parties d.  Large number of witnesses
b.  Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e.  Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c.  Substantial amount of documentary evidence f.  Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a.  monetary b.  nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c.  punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): 1
5. This case  is  is not a class action suit.
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-105.)
Date: November 18, 2019
Camryn P. Berk 
(SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF PARTY WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY)
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
NOTICE
• Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the
Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions.
• File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
• If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to
the action or proceeding.
• Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only. Page 1 of 2
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400-3.403, 3.740
Judicial Council of California
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10
CM-010 [Rev. July 1, 2007] Our File no. 3866361
Document Filed Date
November 20, 2019
Case Filing Date
November 20, 2019
Category
Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction)
Status
Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/20/2019 02:29 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by D. Santos,Deputy Clerk VMEDIASTART=FILENO=/3866361~CMT=/CA - SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT 19NWLC45484 CM-010 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Christopher A. Beyer, State Bar #213264 Camryn P. Berk, State Bar #317565 RAUSCH STURM 3131 Camino Del Rio N., Suite 350 San Diego, CA 92108 TELEPHONE NO.: (877) 215-2552 FAX NO.: (877) 396-4464 ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 12720 NORWALK BOULEVARD MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: NORWALK, CA 90650 BRANCH NAME: NORWALK COURTHOUSE CASE NAME: Second Round Sub, LLC assignee of Comenity Capital Bank (TOYOTA CREDIT CARD) vs. CASE NUMBER: MARISOL V SOLIS, et al. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation JUDGE:  Unlimited  Limited  Counter  Joinder DEPT: (Amount demanded (Amount demanded Filed with first appearance by defendant exceeds $25,000) is $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) Items 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2). 1. Check one box below for the case types that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation  Auto (22)  Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400 - 3.403)  Uninsured motorist (46)  Rule 3.740 collections (09)  Antitrust/Trade regulation (03) Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/Property  Other Collections (09)  Construction defect (10) Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort  Insurance coverage (18)  Mass tort (40)  Asbestos (04)  Other contract (37)  Securities litigation (28)  Product liability (24) Real Property  Environmental /Toxic tort (30)  Medical Malpractice (45)  Eminent domain/Inverse  Insurance coverage claims arising from the  Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort  Wrongful eviction (33) types (41)  Business tort/unfair business practice (07)  Other real property (26)  Civil Rights (08) Unlawful Detainer Enforcement of Judgment  Defamation (13)  Commercial (31)  Enforcement of judgment (20)  Fraud (16)  Residential (32) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint  Intellectual Property (19)  Drugs (38)  RICO (27)  Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review  Other complaint (not specified above) (42)  Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35)  Asset forfeiture (05) Miscellaneous Civil Petition Employment  Petition re: arbitration award (11)  Partnership and corporate governance (21)  Wrongful termination (36)  Writ of mandate (02)  Other petition (not specified above) (43)  Other employment (15)  Other judicial review (39) 2. This case  is  is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: a.  Large number of separately represented parties d.  Large number of witnesses b.  Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e.  Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court c.  Substantial amount of documentary evidence f.  Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision 3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a.  monetary b.  nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c.  punitive 4. Number of causes of action (specify): 1 5. This case  is  is not a class action suit. 6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-105.) Date: November 18, 2019 Camryn P. Berk  (SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF PARTY WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) NOTICE • Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions. • File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule. • If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the action or proceeding. • Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only. Page 1 of 2 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400-3.403, 3.740 Judicial Council of California CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10 CM-010 [Rev. July 1, 2007] Our File no. 3866361