On November 20, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Svetlitsa Tatyana,
and
American Honda Motor Co,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/18/2020 12:00 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address), jacob Kashani (298391) FOR COURT
USE ONLY
The Law Offices Jacob K. Kashani,A.P.C.
6277 Van Nuys Blvd Suite 125
Van Nuys, CA 91401
TELEPHONE NO.: 818-649-6666 FAX NO. (Optional): 818-649-6667
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): jacob@jkashanilaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): TATYANA SVETLITSA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
street aporess: 111 N. Hill St.
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND
ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012
BRANCH NAME: Central
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: TATYANA SVETLITSA
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): [Z) untimitep cASE [ timitep case 19STCV41640
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 02/21/2020 Time: 8:30 AM Dept.: 58 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[) Notice of Intentto Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. [1] This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff, TATYANA SVETLITSA
b. [-) This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a The complaint was filed on (date):
b. [J The cross-compiaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. CZ] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [7] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [£1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c [ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Breach of Implied Warranty, Breach of Express Warranty, Violation of Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act
relating to the purchase of a new motor vehicle.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Cour,
rules 3.720-3.730
“Giitojren
day 1 2041) www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
February 18, 2020
Case Filing Date
November 20, 2019
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 04/24/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.