On November 05, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Daskalos Michelle,
and
Eel Holdings Llc,
Lewis Elliot,
for Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/20/2020 06:06 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by W. Moore,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY
Zein E. Obagi, Jr. (SBN: 264139)
Obagi Law Group, P.C
811 Wilshire Boulevard | Suite 1709 Los Angeles, CA 90017
TELEPHONENo: (424) 284-2401 FAX NO. (Optional: (424) 204-0719
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Zo@obagilaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Michell Daskalos
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
street appress: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
CITY AND ziP CODE: Log Angeles 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Michelle Daskalos
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Eel Holdings LLC, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE [—) timitep case 19STCV 39699
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: March 4, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 69 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[_] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Michelle Daskalos
b. [__] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a The complaint was filed on (date): November 4, 2019
b. [_] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Servi (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b CJ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1] have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [] have had a default entered against them (specify names):
Cc. Co The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a Type of casein Lv ] complaint C4 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiff alleges the following causes of actions: (1) breach of contract; (2) conversion; and (3) declaratory relief.
Page 1 of 5
"orm Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT al. Rules of Court,
‘Judicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730
‘CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
February 20, 2020
Case Filing Date
November 05, 2019
Category
Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/26/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.