arrow left
arrow right
  • Jason Neel vs United States Real Estate Corporation, et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Jason Neel vs United States Real Estate Corporation, et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Jason Neel vs United States Real Estate Corporation, et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
  • Jason Neel vs United States Real Estate Corporation, et al(26) Unlimited Other Real Property document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Jeffrey H. Lowenthal (State Bar No. 111763) Edward Egan Smith (State Bar No. 169792) 2 Matthew W. Delbridge (State Bar No. 343636) STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS 3 ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP 235 Pine Street, 15th Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 421-3400 5 Facsimile: (415) 421-2234 E-mail: jlowenthal@steyerlaw.com 6 esmith@steyerlaw.com mdelbridge@steyerlaw.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 8 United States Real Estate Corporation 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ 11 12 JASON NEEL, Case No. 22CV01758 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING CODY 14 v. MOLICA’S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS 15 SUPERIOR LOAN SERVICING, ASSET DEFAULT MANAGEMENT, INC., Date: 05/25/23 16 UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE Time: 8:30 a.m. CORPORATION; CNA EQUITIES Dept: 5 17 GROUP, LLC; RUSHMYFILE, Judge: Hon. Timothy Volkmann BUSINESS ENTITY FORM UNKNOWN, 18 and VIGIL REAL ESTATE, BUSINESS Action Filed: August 10, 2021 [Alameda Superior] ENTITY FORM UNKNOWN; and DOES Trial Date: Not Assigned 19 1 through 100, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE 22 CORPORATION, 23 Cross-Complainant, v. 24 JASON NEEL, CNA EQUITY GROUP, 25 INC., a professional corporation, RUSHMYFILE, INC., a California 26 corporation, CODY MOLICA; and ROES 1 through 100, inclusive, 27 Defendants. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING CODY MOLICA’S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS 2022639.2 - NATC.JNEEL 1 Cross-Defendant Cody Molica’s (“Molica”) Motion to Quash Service of Summons of 2 Defendant and Cross-Complainant United States Real Estate Corporation’s (“USREC”) cross- 3 complaint came on for hearing in the Santa Cruz Superior Court on May 25, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. 4 The Court, having reviewed Molica’s moving and reply papers in support of the Motion to 5 Quash, and USREC’s opposition papers, being fully advised, and no party having contested the 6 tentative ruling, and good cause appearing therefor, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion is DENIED. Sufficient evidence is 8 presented that Cody Molica’s dwelling house or usual place of abode for purposes of substituted 9 service was 4360 Stony Point Rd. in Santa Rosa, California at the time of service. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: ______________________ 2023 12 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING CODY MOLICA’S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS 2022639.2 - NATC.JNEEL