On December 23, 2019 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Midland Credit Management Inc.,
and
Esparza Elise,
for Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/10/2021 12:02 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by G. Vela,Deputy Clerk
ee ___GM-200
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): i
MICHAEL D. KAHN FOR COURT USE ONLY
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
350 CAMINO DE LA REINA, SUITE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108
TELEPHONE NO: (866) 300-6750 = FAX NO. fOptionay: (858) 309-1588
E-MAIL ADDRESS Optional},
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. _
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS:
maiLING ADDRESS: 12720 NORWALK BLVD.
city ano zipcope: NORWALK CA 90650
aRANCH NAME: NORWALK COURTHOUSE SOUTHEAST DISTRICT
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. |
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ELISE ESPARZA
| CASE NUMBER:
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE | 19NWLC50261
| JUDGE:
; | DEPT.: |
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OR OTHER PARTY SEEKING RELIEF
You must file a request for dismissal of the entire case within 45 days after the date of the settlement if the settlement
| is unconditional. You must file a dismissal of the entire case within 45 days after the date specified in item 1b below
if the settlement is conditional. Unless you file a dismissal within the required time or have shown good cause
| before the time for dismissal has expired why the case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the entire case.
To the court, all parties, and any arbitrator or other court-connected ADR neutral involved in this case:
1. This entire case has been settled. The settlement is:
a. (] Unconditional. A request for dismissal will be filed within 45 days after the date of the settlement.
Date of settlement:
b. Conditional. The settlement agreement conditions dismissal of this matter on the satisfactory cornpletion
of specified terms that are not to be performed within 45 days of the date of the settlement. A request for
dismissal will be filed no later than (date): March 15, 2022
Date initial pleading
2. filed: December 23, 2019
3. Next scheduled hearing or conference:
a. Purpose:
b. (1} Date: January 05, 2022
(2) Time: 8:30 AM
(3) Department: A
4. Trial date:
a. No trial date set
b. [J (1) Date:
(2) Time:
(3) Department:
| eet penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California thattip fgregoing is true and correct.
Date: 4 \
A. MICHAEL D. KAHN >
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY [] PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE)
ee || Ds ust opp tetiieprrariteierirerrrerece. Page 1 of 2.
earysanlenlby abrir Reda’ NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF ENTIRE CASE Gal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1385
vecounts.
ca gov
CM-200 Rev. January 1.2007}
CA_0326G File No.: 19-30016]
Document Filed Date
December 10, 2021
Case Filing Date
December 23, 2019
Category
Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.