arrow left
arrow right
  • John Doe CLG03277 vs Carpinteria Unified School DistrictUnlimited Other PI/PD/WD (23) document preview
  • John Doe CLG03277 vs Carpinteria Unified School DistrictUnlimited Other PI/PD/WD (23) document preview
  • John Doe CLG03277 vs Carpinteria Unified School DistrictUnlimited Other PI/PD/WD (23) document preview
  • John Doe CLG03277 vs Carpinteria Unified School DistrictUnlimited Other PI/PD/WD (23) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Pursuant to CRC 2.259 this document has been electronically filed by the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara, on 02/27/2023 FILED Pedro “Peter” de la Cerda (SBN 249085) SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA EDWARDS & DE LA CERDA, PLLC COUNTY of SANTA BARBARA 3500 Maple Ave., Ste 1100 03/02/2023 Dallas, TX 75219 P: 214.550.5239 Darrel E. Parker, Executive Officer F: 214.722.2101 BY _ Baksh, Narzralli peter@edwardsdelacerda.com Deputy Clerk ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA JOHN DOE CLG03277 ) Case No. 22CV05053 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE THOMAS P. ANDERLE 10 VS Department 3 da DOE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a business entity ) pROPeSEDT ORDER APPROVING 12 of form unknown; and DOES 1-500. PLAINTIFF’S CERTIFICATES OF MERIT, CONCURRENTLY LODGED HEREWITH, 13 Defendants. PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL 14 PROCEDURE §340.1(g) AND AUTHORIZING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT 15 16 ) [Filed concurrently with Notice of Lodgment] 17 PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION 18 THE MATTER BEING PROPERLY SUBMITTED and the Court having reviewed Plaintiff 19 John Doe CLG03277 Certificates of Merit Lodged Under Seal with the Court, in camera, pursuant to 20 Code of Civil Procedure §340.1, the Court hereby approves those Certificates of Merit. Specifically, 21 the Court makes the following finds: 22 1 The Certificates of Merit lodged under seal in Plaintiff's Notice of Lodgment have been 23 reviewed in camera by the Court, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §340.1(i): 24 2 After in camera review of the Certificates of Merit, the Court finds, based solely on 25 those Certificates of Merit that the Court reviewed in the Notice of Lodgment, that there is reasonable 26 and meritorious cause for the filing of the action against the defendant therein. Specifically, these 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING CERTIFICATES OF MERIT, PURSUANT TO C.C.P. §340.1(g) Certificates of Merit have been approved, and service authorized for the following case: John Doe CLG03277 v. Doe School District, et al., Santa Barbara County Superior Court, Case No. 22CV05053. Based upon the above findings, the Court makes the following ORDER authorizing Plaintiffto serve his Summonses and Complaint upon Defendant: 1 Plaintiff is formally authorized to serve the Complaint and Summons, in his case, upon Defendant; 2 Service of Plaintiff's Complaint and Summons upon Defendant must occur within 60 days of the entry of this Order by this Court. 7 Meas PCdkaLe IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 03/02/2023 DATE: da The Honorable Thomas P. Anderle Judge of the Superior Court of California 12 County of Santa Barbara 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING CERTIFICATES OF MERIT, PURSUANT TO C.C.P. §340.1(g)