arrow left
arrow right
  • NATIONWIDE INDEMNITY COMPANY VS THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • NATIONWIDE INDEMNITY COMPANY VS THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/09/2020 04:54 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Albert K. Alikin (SBN 265119) / Kent V. Grover (SBN 316579) GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1900, Los Angeles, CA 90017 TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 415-7200 FAX NO. (Optional): (213) 415-7299 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): aalikin@goldbergsegalla.com; kgrover@goldbergsegalla.co ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Nationwide Indemnity Company SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Nationwide Indemnity Company DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: The Travelers Indemnity Company, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20STCV07937 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: July 21, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 19 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Albert K. Alikin; Landon J. Greene; Kent V. Grover INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Nationwide Indemnity Company b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 2/26/20 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): First Amended Complaint filed 5/21/20 involving breach of contract, equitable contribution and declaratory relief against Defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. Travelers has been dismissed. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov