arrow left
arrow right
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS THOMAS BEETON Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS THOMAS BEETON Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/04/2019 10:57 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Castaneda,Deputy Clerk 19CHLC35359 Assigned for all purposes to: Chatsworth Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Robert Schuit 1 Christopher A. Beyer, State Bar #213264 Karen Etsell Lusis, State Bar #272739 2 Camryn P. Berk, State Bar #317565 RAUSCH STURM 3 3131 Camino Del Rio N., Suite 350 4 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (877) 215-2552 5 Facsimile: (877) 396-4464 E-mail Address: LawfirmCA@rsieh.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CHATSWORTH COURTHOUSE 10 11 American Express National Bank, ) Case No.: ) 12 Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR: ) 1. ACCOUNT STATED 13 vs. ) 14 ) THOMAS BEETON; ) PRAYER AMOUNT: $12,293.31 15 and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) LIMITED CIVIL CASE 16 Defendants. ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff American Express National Bank (“Plaintiff”) alleges the following facts as to all causes of 19 action as follows: 20 1. Plaintiff is qualified to do business in California. 21 2. This Court is proper for this action because Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant 22 23 THOMAS BEETON is a resident within the jurisdictional boundaries of this Court. 24 3. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant THOMAS BEETON and Defendants sued by the 25 fictitious names DOES 1 through 10 (“Defendants”) are responsible for the alleged debt; however, Plaintiff 26 is unaware of the true names and capacities of DOES 1 through 10 and will seek leave of this Court to 27 amend this Complaint when the true names and capacities have been ascertained. 28 1 COMPLAINT 3830163