arrow left
arrow right
  • SOMPO JAPAN NIPPONKOA INSURANCE INC. VS PASHA STEVEDORING AND TERMINALS INC. Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SOMPO JAPAN NIPPONKOA INSURANCE INC. VS PASHA STEVEDORING AND TERMINALS INC. Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/26/2020 12:10 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Salcido,Deputy Clerk CM-110 [ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Nicholas S. Politis/SBN 92978; Alisa Manasantivongs/SBN 960227 FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP One World Trade Center, Suite 1800 Long Beach, CA 90831-1800 TELEPHONENO. 562-435-2626 FAX NO. (Optional). 562-437-7555 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): nicholasp@fdw-law.com;alisam@fdw-law.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name)’ Def, Pasha Stevedoring & Terminals L.P. |SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 275 Magnolia Avenue MAILING ADDRESS: icity AND zip cove: Long Beach, CA 90802 BRANCH NAME: SOUTH DISTRICT PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: SOMPO JAPAN NIPPONKOA INSURANCE INC. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: PASHA STEVEDORING AND TERMINALS, INC., et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: ( uimitep case 20LBCV00098 (Check one). (©) UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) |A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: July 13, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: S27 Div. Room: Address of court (if different from the address above). |<] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Nicholas S. Politis INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. [5] This statement is submitted by party (name): Def. Pasha Stevedoring & Terminals L.P. b. [_] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names). Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date). b. [3¢] The cross-compiaint, if any, was filed on (date): June 26, 2020 Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [GC] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [3¢] have not been served (specify names and explain why not). Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd., CF Clipper Tenacious LLP; cross-complaint was just filed on June 26, 2020 (2) [] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [_] have had a default entered against them (specify names). c. [__] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served). Description of case a. Type ofcase in [X] complaint (Gq cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action). Plaintiffs complaint includes causes of action for damage to cargo, negligence and breach of warranty. Pasha's cross- complaint includes causes of action for indemnity, apportionment of fault, and declaratory relief. Page t of 6 Form Adoptedfor Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California rules 3.720-3 730, (CM-110 [Rev, July 1, 2011] wuw.courts.ca.gov