arrow left
arrow right
  • SOMPO JAPAN NIPPONKOA INSURANCE INC. VS PASHA STEVEDORING AND TERMINALS INC. Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SOMPO JAPAN NIPPONKOA INSURANCE INC. VS PASHA STEVEDORING AND TERMINALS INC. Negligent Breach of Contract/Warranty (no fraud) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/27/2020 01:00 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Salcido,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Dennis A. Cammarano / SBN: 123662 O/R: 3492 To keep other people from CAMMARANO LAW GROUP seeing what you entered on your form, please press the 555 E. Ocean Blvd., Ste. 501, Long Beach, CA 90802 Clear This Form button at the TELEPHONE NO.: 562-495-9501 FAX NO. (Optional): 562-495-3674 end of the form when E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): dcammarano@camlegal.com finished. ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plainiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 275 Magnolia Ave. MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Long Beach, CA 90802 BRANCH NAME: SOUTH DISTRICT PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Insurance Inc. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Pasha Stevedoring and Terminals Inc. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): ✔ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20LBCV00098 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: November 18, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: S27 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): ✔ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Dennis A. Cammarano INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. ✔ This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): February 13, 2020 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. ✔ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in ✔ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Claim for damage to cargo; Negligence; Breach of Warranty Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov