arrow left
arrow right
  • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VS CITY OF NORWALK, ET AL. Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VS CITY OF NORWALK, ET AL. Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/29/2020 02:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk (NO FEE – GOV’T § CODE 6103) 1 ARNOLD M. ALVAREZ-GLASMAN (SBN 80095) CHRISTOPHER G. CARDINALE (SBN 274453) 2 JOHN W. LAM (SBN 238492) ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN 3 Attorneys at Law 13181 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 400 4 City of Industry, CA 91746 (562) 699-5500 · Facsimile (562) 692-2244 5 Email: aglasman@agclawfirm.com 6 Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant CITY OF NORWALK 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Case No.: 20STCP01480 12 Petitioner/Plaintiff, Assigned for All Purposes to 13 Honorable James C. Chalfant, Department 85 vs. 14 CITY OF NORWALK’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT 15 CITY OF NORWALK; CITY OF BELL OF MANDATE (C.C.P. § 1085) AND GARDENS; CITY OF LYNWOOD; and COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND 16 DOES 3-10, inclusive, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 17 Respondents/Defendants. Action Filed: April 23, 2020 18 Trial Date: None set 19 20 21 In answer to the Petition and Complaint of Petitioner and Plaintiff, COUNTY OF LOS 22 ANGELES (the “County” or “Petitioner”) for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory and 23 injunctive relief (“Petition”) Respondent and Defendant, CITY OF NORWALK, (the “City” or 24 “Respondent”) admits, denies and alleges as follows: 25 1. Respondent admits the material allegations in Paragraph 1 of the Petition. 26 2. Respondent denies this case is only about protecting the residents of the State of 27 California and County of Los Angeles, and alleges this case is also about protecting the residents 28 of the City of Norwalk, coordination between political subdivisions, and adherence to the express 1 CITY OF NORWALK’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE (C.C.P. § 1085) AND COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF