Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/25/2022 03:48 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Sino-Cruz,Deputy Clerk
.·
1 ROBIE & MATTHAI
A Professional Corporation
2 MARTA A. ALCUMBRAC, SBN 185551
GABRIELLE M. JACKSON, SBN 167528
3 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3950
Los Angeles, California 90071-2609
4 Telephone: (213) 706-8000
Facsimile: (213) 706-9913
5 E-mail: malcumbrac@romalaw.com
gjackson@romalaw.com
6
Attorneys for Cross-Defendant CALIFORNIA CONSUMER ATTORNEYS, P.C.
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
9
HACKLER DAGHIGHIAN MARTINO & CASE NO.: 20STCV19127
10 NOVAK, P.C., a California Professional
Corporation, [Assigned to the Han. Timothy Patrick Dillon,
11 Dept. 73}
Plaintiff,
12 [MIL NO.4]
vs.
13 CALIFORNIA CONSUMER ATTORNEY'S
KNIGHT LAW GROUP, a California Limited MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE
14 Liability Partnership, STEVE BORISLA W SPECULATIVE EVIDENCE OF TRADE
MIKHOV, an individual, and DOES 1 through SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION;
15 10, inclusive, DECLARATION OF MARTA A.
ALCUMBRACINSUPPORT
16 Defendants,
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - 1 DATE: March 13,2022
17 KNIGHT LAW GROUP, LLP, a California TIME: 8:30a.m.
limited liability partnership, DEPT.: 73
18
Cross-Complainant,
19 vs. Filing Date: May 19,2020
FSC Date: March 14, 2022
20 HACKLER DAGHIGHIAN MARTINO & Trial Date: March 28, 2022
NOVAK, P.C., a California Professional Disc. C/0: February 28, 2022
21 Corporation; SEPEHRDAGHIGHIAN, an Motion C/0: ·March 14, 2022
individual; LAW OFFICES OF MlCHAEL H.
22 ROSENSTEIN, LC, a California professional
corporation; MICHAEL H. ROSENSTEIN, an
23 individual; CALIFORNIA CONSUMER
ATTORNEYS, P.C., a California professional
24 corporation; QUILL & ARROW LLP, a
California limited liability partnership; KEVIN
25 Y. JACOBOSN, an individual; JONATHAN
SHIRIAN, an individual, and ROES 1 through
26 20, inclusive,
27 Cross-Defendants.
28
---------------------------------~1 ______________________________
Page 1 of 75 _
MIL NO. 4- CALIFORNIA CONSUMER ATTORNEY'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE SPECULATIVE EVIDENCE OF
TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION