arrow left
arrow right
  • PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC VS RANDIE RODRIGUEZ Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC VS RANDIE RODRIGUEZ Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/04/2020 01:27 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Armenta,Deputy Clerk 20NWLC09302 Assigned for all purposes to: Norwalk Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Lillian Vega Jacobs Michael S. Hunt #99804 Janalie Henriques #111589 Keri L. Salet #318913 HUNT & HENRIQUES, Attorneys at Law 151 Bernal Road Suite 8, San Jose CA 95119-1306 Telephone: (800) 680—2426 Facsimile: (408) 362—2299 Attorneys for Plaintiff File no. 1369766001 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Norwalk (Southeast Judicial) 10 Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC Case No. 11 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR: 12 vs. (1) Account Stated 13 (2) Open Book Account SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA 95119 TELEPHONE: (408) 362-2270 HUNT 8: HENRIQUES 151 BERNAL ROAD SUITE 8 FACSIMILE: (408) 362-2299 14 PRAYER AMOUNT: $6,243.77 15 RANDIE RODRIGUEZ LIMITED CIVIL Amount demanded does not exceed $10,000 16 Defendant(s). 17 18 Plaintiff, Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, (“Plaintiff”), alleges: 19 1. Plaintiff is a limited liability company. 20 2. This court is the proper court because Plaintiff is informed and believes that 21 Defendant, RANDIE RODRIGUEZ (“Defendant”), is a resident of LOS ANGELES County, 22 State of California. 23 3. At all times herein mentioned, Defendants, and each of them, were the principals, 24 agents, employers, employees, masters, or servants of each of their co-defendants and ratified, 25 adopted or approved the acts or omissions alleged herein, and each defendant, in doing the things 26 alleged, were acting in the course and scope of said authority of such agents, servants, and 27 employees. 28 COMPLAINT Page 1 A 1 1369766001