On June 18, 2020 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
G&N Marinewerks Inc. A California Corporation,
and
Namdar Bijan Aka Bijan Gianni Namdar,
for Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/28/2022 12:46 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Abraham,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Michael J. Conway, Esq. (SBN: 180604)
Nolan Heimann, LLP
16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 820
Encino, CA 91436
TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 574-5710 FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): mconway@nolanheimann.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff G&N MarineWerks, Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: G&N MarineWerks, Inc.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Bijan Namdar
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
20STCV23074
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: February 4, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 17 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael J. Conway, Esq. and William J. Wall, Esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name):
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Plaintiff G&N MarineWerks, Inc. and Defendant Bijan Namdar
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): June 18, 2020
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiff filed this action against one of its shareholders and a former officer of the corporation for Embezzlement, Conversion,
Fraud, and Breach of Fiduciary Duty.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
January 28, 2022
Case Filing Date
June 18, 2020
Category
Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.