arrow left
arrow right
  • G&N MARINEWERKS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS BIJAN NAMDAR Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • G&N MARINEWERKS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS BIJAN NAMDAR Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/28/2022 12:46 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Abraham,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Michael J. Conway, Esq. (SBN: 180604) Nolan Heimann, LLP 16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 820 Encino, CA 91436 TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 574-5710 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): mconway@nolanheimann.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff G&N MarineWerks, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: G&N MarineWerks, Inc. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Bijan Namdar CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: 20STCV23074 (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: February 4, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 17 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael J. Conway, Esq. and William J. Wall, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Plaintiff G&N MarineWerks, Inc. and Defendant Bijan Namdar 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): June 18, 2020 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiff filed this action against one of its shareholders and a former officer of the corporation for Embezzlement, Conversion, Fraud, and Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov