arrow left
arrow right
  • JASMINE NGUYEN VS RICHARD CHHOR, ET AL. Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JASMINE NGUYEN VS RICHARD CHHOR, ET AL. Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/27/2021 12:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Julie N. Nong (SBN 208013) NT Law 2600 W. Olive Ave., 5th Fl., #647 Burbank, CA 91505 TELEPHONE NO.: 888.588.0428 FAX NO. (Optional): 888.588.0427 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): julienong@hotmail.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Jasmine Nguyen SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill St. MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Plaintiff Jasmine Nguyen DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Richard Chhor, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20STCV31765 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 09/30/2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 53 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Julie Nong INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Jasmine Nguyen b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): Richard Chhor did not receive a discharge; request for entry of default is submitted against Catherine Huang, Theresa Vu, Ellen K. Gold (Doe 1), Linda L. Vo (Doe 2) and Billy Phan (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): 1) Breach of Contract; 2) Fraud; 3) Constructive Fraud against Tony Ta; 4) Negligent Misrepresentation; 5) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; 6) Conversion; 7) Conspiracy against Richard Chhor and Peter Tri Nguyen; 8) Conspiracy against R. Chhor, P. Tri Nguyen, T. Ta, C. Huang, H. Phan, T. Vu and B. Phan; 9) Money Had and Received; 10) Quiet Title; and 11) Accounting Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov