Answer: ROBERT A VUKELICH VS LINDSEY CALHOUN

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/18/2020 12:01 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Inloes,Deputy Clerk




                  1     Mitchel T. Stanton (Bar No. 150174)
                        LAW OFFICES OF MITCHEL T. STANTON
                  2     A Professional Corporation
                        23679 Calabasas Road, Suite 610
                  3     Calabasas, CA 91302
                        (818) 225-8409
                  4
                        Attorney for Defendant/Cross-Complainant
                  5     Lindsey Colhoun erroneously
                        sued as Lindsey Calhoun
                  6
                  7
                  8                                                 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
                  9                                                    FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                10
                11
                12      ROBERT A. VUKELICH dba RAVE            )                                       CASE NO.: 20VECV01014
                        CONSTRUCTION                           )
                13                                             )                                       Complaint Filed: 9/10/20
                                     Plaintiff,                )
                14                                             )                                       Assigned to Hon. Theresa M. Traber in
                        vs.                                    )                                       department NW “U”]
                15                                             )
                        LINDSEY CALHOUN, an Individual, and    )
                16      DOES 1 through 50, inclusive           )                                       LINDSEY COLHOUN’S ANSWER TO
                                                               )                                       COMPLAINT
                17                   Defendants                )
                        ______________________________________ )
                18
                19
                                    COMES NOW, Defendant, Lindsey Colhoun erroneously sued as Lindsey Calhoun
                20
                        (“answering Defendant”) by and though her attorneys of record, and hereby answers the unverified
                21
                        Complaint of Plaintiff, Robert A. Vukelich dba Rave Construction(hereinafter referred to as
                22      “Plaintiff”) as follows:
                23                                                                GENERAL DENIALS
                24                  1.         Under the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure § 431.30, this answering
                25      Defendant denies both generally and specifically, each and every allegation contained in the

                26      Complaint, and the whole thereof, and each and every alleged cause of action thereof, and denies that
                        Plaintiff sustained damages as alleged in any sum or sum, or at all, by reason of any alleged act,
                27
                        breach or omission on the part of this answering Defendant.
                28


                                                                                       1
                                                                       LINDSEY COLHOUN’S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT