arrow left
arrow right
  • BRIANNA MAREESE JACOCKS, ET AL. VS ROBERT AARON WELLS, ET AL. Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • BRIANNA MAREESE JACOCKS, ET AL. VS ROBERT AARON WELLS, ET AL. Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/21/2021 05:36 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Briggs,Deputy Clerk 1 DANIELS, FINE, ISRAEL, SCHONBUCH & LEBOVITS, LLP 1801 CENTURY PARK EAST, NINTH FLOOR 2 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 TELEPHONE (310) 556-7900 FACSIMILE (310) 556-2807 3 Michael Schonbuch, State Bar No. 150884 Mary R. Fersch, State Bar No. 305855 4 Attorneys For Defendant 5 FIELD TURF USA, INC. 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTH DISTRICT 9 10 BRIANNA MAREESE JACOCKS, a minor by Case No. 20AVCV00726 11 and through her Guardian ad Litem STANLEY [Complaint Filed: October 8, 2020] 12 JACOCKS, KATIE FRANCIS JACOCKS, a [Hon. Wendy Chang, Dept. A15] minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem 13 STANLEY JACOCKS, GENE DAVEYON OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX BERNIE JACOCKS, a minor by and through his PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 14 Guardian ad Litem STANLEY JACOCKS, TRIAL AND FACT DISCOVERY AS TO KRYSTOL RENEE MCDONALD, and KYIRA DEFENDANTS; DECLARATION OF 15 RENEE MCDONALD, MARY R. FERSCH 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 ROBERT AARON WELLS, FIELDTURF USA, 19 INC., and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 COMES NOW Defendant FIELDTURF USA, INC. (“Defendant”), and hereby 23 respectfully submits the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to 24 Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial and Fact Discovery as to Defendants. Defendant 25 does not oppose Plaintiffs’ request asking for an order to continue trial by the statutory maximum 26 of fourteen (14) days. However, Defendant takes issue with and opposes Plaintiffs’ apparent request 27 for an outright one-sided waiver of the discovery cutoff as to Defendant only and all other requests 28 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND FACT DISCOVERY AS TO DEFENDANTS; DECLARATION OF MARY R. FERSCH