On July 14, 2020 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Parzivand Daniel M.,
Zelener Ilana,
Zelener Jacqueline,
and
All Persons Unknown Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right Title Estate Lien Or Interest...,
All Persons Unknown Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right Title Estate Lien Or Interest In The Property Described In The Complaint,
Parzivand Daniel M.,
Parzivand Jacqueline,
for Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 1
20STCV26377 June 22, 2021
ILANA ZELENER vs DANIEL M. PARZIVAND, et al. 8:30 AM
Judge: Honorable David J. Cowan CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: L. Albino ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: R. Innis Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances
For Defendant(s): No Appearances
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Court Order Re Notice of Related Cases Re Ilana Zelener v.
Daniel M. Parzivand (20STCV26377); Jacqueline Victoria Parvizand v. Daniel Moshiach
Parzivand (20VEFL00312)
On April 27, 2021, Daniel M. Parzivand (“Daniel”) filed a Notice of Related Case indicating
pending civil case 20STCV26377 is related to pending family law case 20VEFL00312.
Department 1 did not receive a timely Response to the Notice of Related Case. (CRC 3.300(g).)
CRC 3.300(d) requires that the Notice of Related Case “be filed in all pending cases listed in the
notice and must be served on all parties in those cases.” The Notice was filed in both cases and
served on the necessary parties.
Whether a pending civil law case is related to a pending probate or family law matter is a
question determined by Department 1. (LASC Local Rule 3.3(f)(2).) Pursuant to LASC Local
Rule 3.3(f)(2), “[w]here the cases listed in a Notice of Related Cases contains a probate or family
law case, Department 1 shall determine whether the cases shall be ordered related and, if so, to
which department they shall be assigned if the cases are all pending in the Central District or
pending in two different districts.”
Cases are related when they (1) involve the same parties and are based on the same or similar
claims, (2) arise from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events
requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact, (3)
involve claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property, or (4) are likely
for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different
judges. (CRC 3.300(a).) The Notice here indicates the cases are related on the first through third
grounds above.
In order of filing, the cases sought to be related are:
Minute Order Page 1 of 4
Document Filed Date
June 22, 2021
Case Filing Date
July 14, 2020
Category
Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 1 20STCV26377 June 22, 2021 ILANA ZELENER vs DANIEL M. PARZIVAND, et al. 8:30 AM Judge: Honorable David J. Cowan CSR: None Judicial Assistant: L. Albino ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: R. Innis Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances For Defendant(s): No Appearances NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Court Order Re Notice of Related Cases Re Ilana Zelener v. Daniel M. Parzivand (20STCV26377); Jacqueline Victoria Parvizand v. Daniel Moshiach Parzivand (20VEFL00312) On April 27, 2021, Daniel M. Parzivand (“Daniel”) filed a Notice of Related Case indicating pending civil case 20STCV26377 is related to pending family law case 20VEFL00312. Department 1 did not receive a timely Response to the Notice of Related Case. (CRC 3.300(g).) CRC 3.300(d) requires that the Notice of Related Case “be filed in all pending cases listed in the notice and must be served on all parties in those cases.” The Notice was filed in both cases and served on the necessary parties. Whether a pending civil law case is related to a pending probate or family law matter is a question determined by Department 1. (LASC Local Rule 3.3(f)(2).) Pursuant to LASC Local Rule 3.3(f)(2), “[w]here the cases listed in a Notice of Related Cases contains a probate or family law case, Department 1 shall determine whether the cases shall be ordered related and, if so, to which department they shall be assigned if the cases are all pending in the Central District or pending in two different districts.” Cases are related when they (1) involve the same parties and are based on the same or similar claims, (2) arise from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact, (3) involve claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property, or (4) are likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. (CRC 3.300(a).) The Notice here indicates the cases are related on the first through third grounds above. In order of filing, the cases sought to be related are: Minute Order Page 1 of 4