On September 25, 2020 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Lopez Octavio,
and
Lyon Staffing Solutions Inc.,
Upm Inc.,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Thomas S. Ingrassia, Esq., SBN 149673
Zachary H. Rankin, Esq., SBN 319980 FILED
PETTIT KOHN INGRASSIA LUTZ & DOLIN PC Sup erior Court of California
‘ounty of Los Angeles
11622 El Camino Real, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 755-8500 APR 01 2021
Facsimile: (858) 755-8504 Sherri R, erp xeQul icer/Cterk of Court
E-mail: tingrassia@pettitkohn.com
Deputy
rankin@pettitkohn.com Kristina Var,
Attorneys for Defendant
UPM, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11 OCTAVIO LOPEZ, on behalf
of himself and | CASE NO.: 20STCV36695
all others similarly situated,
12
Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT UPM, INC.’S ANSWER TO
13 PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
Vv. COMPLAINT
14
UPM, INC., a California corporation;
[Via Fax!
RECEIVED
15 LYON STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., a
California corporation; and DOES 1 Dept.: 7 APR U1 2021
16
17
through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
Judge: Hon. Amy D.
Filed:
Trial:
September 25,
Not set
‘ts 09 Window
18
19 COMES NOW, Defendant UPM, Inc. (“Defendant”), and through its attorneys, Pettit
20 Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin PC answers Plaintiff Octavio Lopez’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended
21 Complaint (“the Complaint”) by generally denying each and every allegation contained therein.
22 GENERAL DENIAL
23 Pursuant to the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d),
24 Defendant denies, generally and specifically, each, every and all of the allegations of the
25 Complaint as a whole, and further generally and specifically denies that Plaintiff has sustained
26 any loss, injury, or damage as a proximate result of any act, breach, or omission on the part of
27 Defendant.
28 Ml
2047-2446
1
DEFENDANT UPM, INC.’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Document Filed Date
April 01, 2021
Case Filing Date
September 25, 2020
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Stipulated Judgment - Before Trial 08/30/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Thomas S. Ingrassia, Esq., SBN 149673 Zachary H. Rankin, Esq., SBN 319980 FILED PETTIT KOHN INGRASSIA LUTZ & DOLIN PC Sup erior Court of California ‘ounty of Los Angeles 11622 El Camino Real, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 755-8500 APR 01 2021 Facsimile: (858) 755-8504 Sherri R, erp xeQul icer/Cterk of Court E-mail: tingrassia@pettitkohn.com Deputy rankin@pettitkohn.com Kristina Var, Attorneys for Defendant UPM, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 OCTAVIO LOPEZ, on behalf of himself and | CASE NO.: 20STCV36695 all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT UPM, INC.’S ANSWER TO 13 PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED Vv. COMPLAINT 14 UPM, INC., a California corporation; [Via Fax! RECEIVED 15 LYON STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1 Dept.: 7 APR U1 2021 16 17 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. Judge: Hon. Amy D. Filed: Trial: September 25, Not set ‘ts 09 Window 18 19 COMES NOW, Defendant UPM, Inc. (“Defendant”), and through its attorneys, Pettit 20 Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin PC answers Plaintiff Octavio Lopez’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended 21 Complaint (“the Complaint”) by generally denying each and every allegation contained therein. 22 GENERAL DENIAL 23 Pursuant to the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d), 24 Defendant denies, generally and specifically, each, every and all of the allegations of the 25 Complaint as a whole, and further generally and specifically denies that Plaintiff has sustained 26 any loss, injury, or damage as a proximate result of any act, breach, or omission on the part of 27 Defendant. 28 Ml 2047-2446 1 DEFENDANT UPM, INC.’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT