On October 30, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Advanced Orthopedic Center Inc.,
Lakeside Medical Organization,
Lakeside Medical Organization A Medical Group Inc.,
Regal Medical Group Inc.,
Regal Medical Group Inc. A California Corporation,
and
Advanced Orthopedic Center Inc.,
Advanced Orthopedic Center Inc. A California Corporation,
Lakeside Medical Organization,
Nissanoff Jonathan M.D.,
Regal Medical Group Inc.,
Ydm Management Co. Inc.,
for Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FILED
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
‘Fes@emee RULING JAN 27 2023
JUDGE KEVIN C. BRAZILE
Dayid Slay r, Execu ive Officer/Clerk of Court
DEPARTMENT 20 By LAA , Deputy
Erica Perez
Case Name Regal Medical Group, Inc., et al. v. Nissanoff, M.D.. et al.
Case No.: 20STCV41811
Matter: Notice of Related Cases
Ruling: The Court will not relate the subject cases.
Nissanoff to give notice.
Nissanoff has filed a notice of related casés, seeking to relate the instant case to case nos.
14803245, 19SMSC03250, 19STSC12264, 20SMSC03165, 20SMSC02014, 20SMSC01241,
208SMCV00776.
™-The inquiry on a notice of related cases is whether the cases at issue (1) involve the same
parties and are based on the same or similar claims; (2) arise from the same or substantially
ir .
identi cal transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially
identical questions of law or fact; (3) involve claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to
the same property; or (4) are likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial
resources if heard by different judges. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300(a).)
x The Court will not relate the subject cases. First, all of the cases at issue were filed years
== aio; Sach that judicial resources have already caused duplication and the benefit of relation has
been substantially diminished,
‘ Similarly, the benefit of relating cases is diminished because the notice indicates all but
“
oné ‘éase has already been disposed of by judgment. Further, the only pending case
(20SMCV00776) is already set for trial in March 2023.
Document Filed Date
January 27, 2023
Case Filing Date
October 30, 2020
Category
Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles ‘Fes@emee RULING JAN 27 2023 JUDGE KEVIN C. BRAZILE Dayid Slay r, Execu ive Officer/Clerk of Court DEPARTMENT 20 By LAA , Deputy Erica Perez Case Name Regal Medical Group, Inc., et al. v. Nissanoff, M.D.. et al. Case No.: 20STCV41811 Matter: Notice of Related Cases Ruling: The Court will not relate the subject cases. Nissanoff to give notice. Nissanoff has filed a notice of related casés, seeking to relate the instant case to case nos. 14803245, 19SMSC03250, 19STSC12264, 20SMSC03165, 20SMSC02014, 20SMSC01241, 208SMCV00776. ™-The inquiry on a notice of related cases is whether the cases at issue (1) involve the same parties and are based on the same or similar claims; (2) arise from the same or substantially ir . identi cal transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact; (3) involve claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property; or (4) are likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300(a).) x The Court will not relate the subject cases. First, all of the cases at issue were filed years == aio; Sach that judicial resources have already caused duplication and the benefit of relation has been substantially diminished, ‘ Similarly, the benefit of relating cases is diminished because the notice indicates all but “ oné ‘éase has already been disposed of by judgment. Further, the only pending case (20SMCV00776) is already set for trial in March 2023.