arrow left
arrow right
  • EKATERINI PAPPAS, ET AL. VS TERESA E. LOPEZ, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • EKATERINI PAPPAS, ET AL. VS TERESA E. LOPEZ, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/12/2021 10:40 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk RUSSELL J. THOMULKA, SBN 63007 Attorney at Law 21243 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1 41 Woodland Hills, California 91364 (818) 594—5004 Attorney for Defendants: Teresa E. Lopez, Diana Jimenez SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - STANLEY MOSK 10 11 EKATERINI PAPPAS, aka KATRINA Case No: 208TCV49888 PAPPAS; TIMOTHY PAPPAS, aka 12 TIM PAPPAS, HONORABLE.MARK V. MOONEY DEPT. 68 13 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO 14 vs. PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO THE DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED 15 TERESA E. LOPEZ (aka ELIZABETH COMPLAINT LOPZZ and TERESA LOPEZ 16 ESPINOZA); DIANA JIMENEZ (aka DANA LOPEZ, DIAN LOPEZ); 17 ALEKSANDRE YURYEVICH.DENISOV (aka ALEKEANDR Y. DENISOB, 18 ALEKEANDR DENISOV, and ALEX DENISOV); RILDA CUEVAS; ELENA 19 KAPUSTINA (aka ELENA KAPOUSTINA, LENA KAPUSTINA, ELENA V. 2O KAPUFTINA, and RLSNA BEREZHNIKH); HECTOR SALGADO 21 (aka SANTIAGO SALGADO); JAQUIN ISRAEL VELAZQUEZ; THE GOLDEN 22 GIRLS INVESTMENTS, INC., L.D.T. INVESTMENTS, INc.; F.O.D.L., 23 INC.; and DOES 1 to 50, INCLUSIVE, Date: May 25, 2021 24 Time: 9:00 a.m. Defendants. Dept: 68 25 Reservation 1D: 782398351927 26 27 THE PLAINTIFFS’ ATTEMPT TO CLARIFY FACTS 28 AS set forth on pages 2w5 o f the Plaintiffs’ Opposition, she 1 DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO THE DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT