On December 31, 2020 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Jimenez Diana Aka Dana Lopez Aka Dian Lopez,
Kapustina Elena Aka Elena Kapoustina Aka Lena Kapustina Aka Elena V Kapuftina Aka Elena Berezhnikh,
Lopez Teresa E. Aka Elizabeth Lopez Aka Teresa Lopez Espinoza,
Pappas Ekaterini Aka Katrina Pappas,
Pappas Timothy Aka Tim Pappas,
and
Cuevas Hilda,
Denisov Aleksandre Yuryevich Aka Alekeandr Y Denisob Aka Alekeandr Denisov Aka Alex Denisov,
F.O.D.L. Inc.,
Jimenez Diana Aka Dana Lopez Aka Dian Lopez,
Kapustina Elena Aka Elena Kapoustina Aka Lena Kapustina Aka Elena V Kapuftina Aka Elena Berezhnikh,
L.D.T. Investments Inc.,
Lopez Teresa E. Aka Elizabeth Lopez Aka Teresa Lopez Espinoza,
Salgado Hector Aka Santiago Salgado,
The Golden Girls Investments Inc.,
Velazquez Jaquim Israel,
for Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/12/2021 10:40 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk
RUSSELL J. THOMULKA, SBN 63007
Attorney at Law
21243 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1 41
Woodland Hills, California 91364
(818) 594—5004
Attorney for Defendants: Teresa E. Lopez, Diana Jimenez
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - STANLEY MOSK
10
11 EKATERINI PAPPAS, aka KATRINA Case No: 208TCV49888
PAPPAS; TIMOTHY PAPPAS, aka
12 TIM PAPPAS, HONORABLE.MARK V. MOONEY
DEPT. 68
13 Plaintiffs,
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO
14 vs. PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO THE
DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED
15 TERESA E. LOPEZ (aka ELIZABETH COMPLAINT
LOPZZ and TERESA LOPEZ
16 ESPINOZA); DIANA JIMENEZ (aka
DANA LOPEZ, DIAN LOPEZ);
17 ALEKSANDRE YURYEVICH.DENISOV
(aka ALEKEANDR Y. DENISOB,
18 ALEKEANDR DENISOV, and ALEX
DENISOV); RILDA CUEVAS; ELENA
19 KAPUSTINA (aka ELENA KAPOUSTINA,
LENA KAPUSTINA, ELENA V.
2O KAPUFTINA, and RLSNA
BEREZHNIKH); HECTOR SALGADO
21 (aka SANTIAGO SALGADO); JAQUIN
ISRAEL VELAZQUEZ; THE GOLDEN
22 GIRLS INVESTMENTS, INC., L.D.T.
INVESTMENTS, INc.; F.O.D.L.,
23 INC.; and DOES 1 to 50,
INCLUSIVE, Date: May 25, 2021
24 Time: 9:00 a.m.
Defendants. Dept: 68
25 Reservation 1D: 782398351927
26
27 THE PLAINTIFFS’ ATTEMPT TO CLARIFY FACTS
28 AS set forth on pages 2w5 o f the Plaintiffs’ Opposition, she
1
DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO THE DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Document Filed Date
May 12, 2021
Case Filing Date
December 31, 2020
Category
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/12/2021 10:40 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk RUSSELL J. THOMULKA, SBN 63007 Attorney at Law 21243 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1 41 Woodland Hills, California 91364 (818) 594—5004 Attorney for Defendants: Teresa E. Lopez, Diana Jimenez SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - STANLEY MOSK 10 11 EKATERINI PAPPAS, aka KATRINA Case No: 208TCV49888 PAPPAS; TIMOTHY PAPPAS, aka 12 TIM PAPPAS, HONORABLE.MARK V. MOONEY DEPT. 68 13 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO 14 vs. PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO THE DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED 15 TERESA E. LOPEZ (aka ELIZABETH COMPLAINT LOPZZ and TERESA LOPEZ 16 ESPINOZA); DIANA JIMENEZ (aka DANA LOPEZ, DIAN LOPEZ); 17 ALEKSANDRE YURYEVICH.DENISOV (aka ALEKEANDR Y. DENISOB, 18 ALEKEANDR DENISOV, and ALEX DENISOV); RILDA CUEVAS; ELENA 19 KAPUSTINA (aka ELENA KAPOUSTINA, LENA KAPUSTINA, ELENA V. 2O KAPUFTINA, and RLSNA BEREZHNIKH); HECTOR SALGADO 21 (aka SANTIAGO SALGADO); JAQUIN ISRAEL VELAZQUEZ; THE GOLDEN 22 GIRLS INVESTMENTS, INC., L.D.T. INVESTMENTS, INc.; F.O.D.L., 23 INC.; and DOES 1 to 50, INCLUSIVE, Date: May 25, 2021 24 Time: 9:00 a.m. Defendants. Dept: 68 25 Reservation 1D: 782398351927 26 27 THE PLAINTIFFS’ ATTEMPT TO CLARIFY FACTS 28 AS set forth on pages 2w5 o f the Plaintiffs’ Opposition, she 1 DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO THE DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT