arrow left
arrow right
  • TAMMY FENNEL, ET AL. VS TODRYS LANG, ET AL. Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • TAMMY FENNEL, ET AL. VS TODRYS LANG, ET AL. Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/28/2022 02:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Daniel J. Lavi (SBN #304172) The Tenants Law Firm 9454 Wilshire Blvd., Penhouse Suite, Beverly Hills, CA 90212 TELEPHONE NO.: (310)432-3200 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): contact@tenantslawfirm.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennel SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STREET ADDRESS:111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS:111 N. Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE:Los Angeles 90012 BRANCH NAME:Central Judicial District - Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennel DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TODRYS LANG and KATARZYNA LANG CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): ✖ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20STCV37230 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 03/23/2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 17 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): ✖ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Daniel J. Lavi, esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. ✖ This statement is submitted by party (name): Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennel b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 09/29/2020 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. ✖ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in ✖ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into a written lease agreement. The subject property lacked the basic characteristics necessary for human habitation. Defendants repeatedly failed to remediate any health violations. COA include - IIED, fraud Page 1 of 5 Cal. Rules of Court, Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov