On September 29, 2020 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Fennel Janae,
Fennel Tammy,
and
Lang Katherine,
Lang Todrys,
for Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/28/2022 02:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Daniel J. Lavi (SBN #304172)
The Tenants Law Firm
9454 Wilshire Blvd., Penhouse Suite, Beverly Hills, CA 90212
TELEPHONE NO.: (310)432-3200 FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): contact@tenantslawfirm.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennel
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
STREET ADDRESS:111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:111 N. Hill Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE:Los Angeles 90012
BRANCH NAME:Central Judicial District - Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennel
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TODRYS LANG and KATARZYNA LANG
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): ✖ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20STCV37230
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 03/23/2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 17 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
✖ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Daniel J. Lavi, esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. ✖ This statement is submitted by party (name): Tammy Fennel and Janae Fennel
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 09/29/2020
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. ✖ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in ✖ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into a written lease agreement. The subject property lacked the basic characteristics
necessary for human habitation. Defendants repeatedly failed to remediate any health violations. COA include - IIED, fraud
Page 1 of 5
Cal. Rules of Court,
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
February 28, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 29, 2020
Category
Wrongful Eviction Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 06/29/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.