arrow left
arrow right
  • EKATERINI PAPPAS, ET AL. VS TERESA E. LOPEZ, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • EKATERINI PAPPAS, ET AL. VS TERESA E. LOPEZ, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/24/2023 08:29 AM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk CIVI~110 KITORNEY OR PAII‘T'Y WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY I .. .JSII J. Thorn'ulka, Esq. State Bar NO. 6300? Law Offices III-Russell J.. Thomulka 21243 Venture Boulevard, Suite 141 Woodland Hills, California 91364 TELEPHONE NO; (818) 594—5004 FAX No. (animal).- E-MAIL Abeasss. ATTORNEY FORrN-dme): Defendants. Teresa E. Lopez, Diana Jimenez SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: _ CITY AND ZIP CODE: LOS Angeles, California 90012 BRANCH NAME: Centrat District, Stanley MOSk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:. Ekatertni Pappas, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Teresa E. Lopez, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check One): [‘3] UNLIMITED CASE |::| LIMITED CASE ZGSTCV49888 -‘ - (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES scheduled as follows: Date: April 4, 2023 ‘ - Time; 9:00 am. Dept: "l2 Div: Room. Address OI enurt {if different from the address above): ] watts-e OI intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Russell J. Thomulka, Esq. __ H INSTRUCTIONS; All applicable boxes must be Checked, and the specified information must be provided. A | . Pan:y at parties (answer one): .. 3.11:1 This statement is submitted by party (name). Defendants Teresa E. Lopez, Diana Jimenez ‘ b. This statement'IS submitted jointiyby parties (names): ‘2. Complaint and cross—complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) I ""Ifa. The complaInt was filed on (date). . .I [:1 The Cross—-Compiaint, if any, was fled on(date): September 29, 202? ‘3. Set vice (to be answered by plaintiffs and CIOSS-complainants only) ' a Dr_____1 All parties named'In the COmplaint and cross—complaint have been served, have appeared or have been dismissed. "1 The ioilowing patties named in the COrrIplaint or cross—complaint (I) I::j have nOt been Served (Specify.names and explain why not). (2) [:3 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) -__ have had a default entered against them (spe'cily names): x The foIIowing additional parties may be added (specify names, nature Of involvement in case, and date by which they may he served) Not sure at this time since the Plaintiff Amended the Complaint tO try to bring'In additional Defendants. 4. DeSCriptiOn Of case ‘ -- a. (Type Of Case in IE1 complaint - [:1 cross—complaint - (Describe, including causes Infection): 3 Action on investment. Page 1 of 5 me {adopted for Mandatory USE.- I I‘ I I A I ' " ' C3). Rules Of Court, , GASE MANAGER-”EN i- STATEMENT ‘ rules 37204.730 Judicial Council of California CM—IIU (Rev. September 1, 2021] ‘ _ _ . wwwcourlssagov