On July 09, 2020 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hernandez Yolanda,
Quinones Victor,
and
Castro Victor,
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority A Public Entity,
for Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Spring Street Courthouse, Department 29
20STCV25773 December 8, 2020
VICTOR QUINONES, et al. vs LOS ANGELES 3:31 PM
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, A
PUBLIC ENTITY
Judge: Honorable Kristin S. Escalante CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: Delsy Beltran ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances
For Defendant(s): Eitan Yehoshua, Esq. , telephonically appearing by Genna Delany, Esq. via
LACourtConnect
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:
Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint (not anti-SLAPP) -
without Demurrer;
Counsel for the Moving Party submits to the Court's Tentative Ruling posted on the court's
website.
The Motion is not called for hearing.
The Court having reviewed and considered the moving papers/opposition/reply, adopts Its
Tentative Ruling as the final ruling of the Court, and rules as follows:
The above Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Los Angeles Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, a public entity on 08/21/2020 is Granted. - WITH LEAVE TO
AMEND. The court strikes the following portions of the complaint: paragraphs MV-2, (c) and
(d) and the words “entrusted, owned” in MV-2f, paragraph 2, line 2. The Court also strikes the
reference to Civil Code section 2100 and the fourth paragraph on attachment MC-2f. Plaintiff
has 30 days to amend.
In the complaint, Plaintiffs allege that they were injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by
the negligence of an unnamed driver employed by Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (“LACMTA”). Plaintiffs allege that they were passengers in another
vehicle that was rear-ended by the LACMTA bus. Plaintiffs seek to hold LACMTA vicariously
Minute Order Page 1 of 2
Document Filed Date
December 08, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 09, 2020
Category
Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 01/26/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Spring Street Courthouse, Department 29 20STCV25773 December 8, 2020 VICTOR QUINONES, et al. vs LOS ANGELES 3:31 PM METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC ENTITY Judge: Honorable Kristin S. Escalante CSR: None Judicial Assistant: Delsy Beltran ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances For Defendant(s): Eitan Yehoshua, Esq. , telephonically appearing by Genna Delany, Esq. via LACourtConnect NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint (not anti-SLAPP) - without Demurrer; Counsel for the Moving Party submits to the Court's Tentative Ruling posted on the court's website. The Motion is not called for hearing. The Court having reviewed and considered the moving papers/opposition/reply, adopts Its Tentative Ruling as the final ruling of the Court, and rules as follows: The above Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, a public entity on 08/21/2020 is Granted. - WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The court strikes the following portions of the complaint: paragraphs MV-2, (c) and (d) and the words “entrusted, owned” in MV-2f, paragraph 2, line 2. The Court also strikes the reference to Civil Code section 2100 and the fourth paragraph on attachment MC-2f. Plaintiff has 30 days to amend. In the complaint, Plaintiffs allege that they were injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by the negligence of an unnamed driver employed by Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“LACMTA”). Plaintiffs allege that they were passengers in another vehicle that was rear-ended by the LACMTA bus. Plaintiffs seek to hold LACMTA vicariously Minute Order Page 1 of 2