Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(a) For violations of subchapters 1, 6, 7 and 9 and sections 2010, 2015,2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045, 2050, 2055, 2060, 2065, 2125, 2130, 2400, 2405, 2415, 2420, 2425, 2430 of chapter 5, division 2, title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and sections 14560.5(a), 14561(c),14561(d), 14570, 14571.6 and 14572 of the Act, the Division shall issue a Notice of Violation. The Notice of Violation shall be issued to a responsible party (i.e., the manager or other person in authority) at the site of the violation and shall contain the information in subsections (1) and (4) below. A copy shall be served upon the legal owner of the entity, (respondent), within ten (10) working days. The Notice of Violation served upon the legal owner shall contain all of the following:(1) A brief statement of the violation(s) alleged.(2) A statement to the effect that the respondent has the right to a formal hearing, upon request, at which they may be represented by counsel.(3) A statement that the respondent's right to a hearing will be deemed waived if respondent fails to respond in writing within 15 days from the date service of the Notice of Violation was received by the respondent, or respondent's agent for service, stating that he/she wishes to assert that right and that, in the event of such failure to respond, the Department may assess the maximum civil penalty permitted by law without a hearing.(4) A sworn statement, signed by the Division inspector issuing the violation(s), verifying the acts or omissions which form the basis of the violation(s).(b) For civil penalties sought by the Department pursuant to sections 14591.1, 14591.2, 14593, or 14594 of the Act, the Division shall provide for notice and a hearing regarding such penalties in accordance with the provisions of chapter 5 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Government Code Section 11500 et seq.); except that notice for violations of the Act, and the regulations enacted thereunder, enumerated in subdivision (a) shall be effected pursuant to the procedures in subdivision (a).(c) Interest shall accrue from the date the payment was due.Notes
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 14 , § 2100Note: Authority cited: Sections 14530.5(b) and 14536, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 14591.1, 14591.2,14593 and 14594, Public Resources Code; and Section 11500 et seq., Government Code.
1. Renumbering and amendment of former section 2100 to section 2400, and renumbering and amendment of former section 2606 to section 2100 filed 6-12- 91 as a change without regulatory effect pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 91, No. 46).
2. Amendment of subsection (a) filed 10-15-91; operative 10-15-91 pursuant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 92, No. 19).
3. Amendment of subsections (a) and (b), repealer of subsection (c) and subsection redesignation and amendment of Note filed 10-7-94; operative 10-7-94 pursuant to Government Code section 11346.2(d) (Register 94, No. 40).
Southern California Rapid Transit District, supra, we did not expressly address whether section 2100 “otherwise provide[s]” for the liability of a public entity within the meaning of Government Code section 815. We now expressly hold that Civil Code section 2100 does so provide.
VICTOR SILVA, SR VS CITY OF FRESNO
21CECG01516
Apr 26, 2022
Fresno County, CA
The Court finds that Plaintiff sufficiently alleges a cause of action based on Government Code section 815.6 and Civil Code section 2100.
MYNOR DAVID JIMENEZ VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRAN
BC650741
Sep 06, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant contends Section 2100 does not impose a specific mandatory duty and instead imposes a discretionary duty upon public entities operating as a common carrier. But the Supreme Court has held that Section 2100 applies to public entities, and it imposes the same specific duty that applies to private entity carriers: to provide for the safety of passengers. As the court held in Lopez v. Southern Cal.
JOSE A CHAVEZ VS LA COUNTY METRO TRANS AUTHORITY ET AL
BC652765
Dec 08, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Auto
Plaintiffs allege that LACMTA, as a common carrier, is required to exercise the utmost care and diligence for the safe carriage of their passengers pursuant to Civil Code section 2100. LACMTA seek to strike allegations related to the negligent entrustment claim and the allegations regarding duty under Civil Code section 2100.
VICTOR QUINONES, ET AL. VS LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC ENTITY
20STCV25773
Dec 08, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
In Acosta, the court reviewed whether the court record presented substantial evidence to support a judgment of negligence against a common carrier defendant based on Civil Code section 2100. (Acosta, 2 Cal.3d at 27.) In Lopez, the court reviewed whether a public entity had a duty to protect passengers aboard its buses from assaults by fellow passengers based on Civil Code Section 2100. (Lopez, 40 Cal.3d at 783.)
VICTORIA DE LA TORRE VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA
BC635817
May 15, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
May 19, 2021
Other
Long Beach
Los Angeles County, CA
Dissolution w/o Minor Children (General Jurisdiction)
Family
Divorce,Separation
Mar 24, 2020
Dismissal
Superior
Riverside County, CA
Oct 19, 2020
Active
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles County, CA
Dissolution w/o Minor Children (General Jurisdiction)
Family
Divorce,Separation
Jul 15, 2019
Other
Long Beach
Los Angeles County, CA
Dissolution w/o Minor Children (General Jurisdiction)
Family
Divorce,Separation
Oct 26, 2018
Settlement
Long Beach
Los Angeles County, CA
Dissolution w/o Minor Children (General Jurisdiction)
Family
Divorce,Separation
e e Roger A. Colvin, Esq. (SBN 68773) (No Filing Fee - Government Code § 6103) Sharon Medellin, Esq. (SBN 213798) ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN Attorneys at Law FI 13181 Crossroads Parkway North Suite 400, West Tower Sup erior C…
Oct 27, 2016
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 07/27/2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Jul 20, 2018
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/26/2019 02:32 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Lopez,Deputy Clerk 1 JACK L. SHEPPARD, STATE BAR N0.92923 (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) LIEBMAN, QUIGLEY & SHEPPARD [Exempt from filing fee under Government…
Nov 20, 2017
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/08/2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Jul 26, 2019
Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
Nv James A. Quadra, SBN 131084 Rebecca Coll, SBN 184468 ELECTRONICALLY QUADRA & COLL, LLP FILED 649 Mission Street, Fifth Floor Superior Court of Caitfornia, San Francisco, California 94105 County of San Francisco Tel: 415-426-3502 03/30/2017 Fax: 415-795-4530 Clerk of the Court BY-SANDRA SCHIRO jquadra@quadracoll.com rcoll@quadracoll.com Pepe Attorneys for Plaintiff Marleen Green SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Case No.: CGC-16-555490 MARLEEN GREEN…
Nov 22, 2016
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 30, 2017
PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
oC em NDA HY BR WN Ye YN YY NY YN NRK NY Se Be ewe Be ew ew eB ew ot AA KF BN — See KX AA KR HDB He BH GS DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney CHERYL. ADAMS, State Bar #164194 ELECTRONICALLY Chief Trial Deputy FILED KAREN E. KIRBY, State Bar #146432 Superior Court of Catifornia, Assistant Chief Trial Deputy County of San Francisco Fox Plaza 05/01/2019 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor Clerk of the Court San Francisco, California 94102-5408 BY:EDNALEEN ALEGRE Telephone: (415) 554-38…
Feb 14, 2019
San Francisco County, CA
May 01, 2019
PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - VEHICLE RELATED
Cm ny nn &F BN 10 Kevin Holl, SBN 124830 Exempt from filing fee Ada Lau, SBN 278837 pursuant to Gov't GORDON-CREED, KELLEY, ELECTRONICALLY Code § 6103 HOLL & SUGERMAN, LLP FILED 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2650 Superior Court of Callfornia, San Francisco, California 94104 County of San Francisco Telephone: (415) 421-3100 03/09/: 2017 Facsimile: (415) 421-3150 BY:SANDRA SCHIRO Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. CITY AND COUNT…
Nov 22, 2016
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 09, 2017
PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.