arrow left
arrow right
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY LENDING II, INC. VS THOMAS V. GIRARDI, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. Confession of Judgment (non-domestic relations) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY LENDING II, INC. VS THOMAS V. GIRARDI, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. Confession of Judgment (non-domestic relations) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Clifford S. Davidson (SBN 246119) Marshall J. Hogan (SBN 286147) Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 350 South Grand Ave., Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA TELEPHONE NO.: 213.929.2500 FAX NO. (Optional): 213.929.2525 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): csdavidson@swlaw.com; mhogan@swlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): California Attorney Lending II, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: California Attorney Lending II, Inc 20STCP03546 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Girardi & Keese, et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE C15 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: Stillwell Madison, LLC v. Girardi & Keese, et al. b. Case number: 20STCV07853 c. Court: same as above Electronically Received 11/20/2020 05:07 PM other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: 12 e. Case type: limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): f. Filing date: 2/25/20 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: same as above other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.courtinfo.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] 4832-6356-2706.1 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com