On October 27, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
California Attorney Lending Ii Inc.,
and
Girardi & Keese A California General Partnership,
Thomas V. Girardi Individually,
for Confession of Judgment (non-domestic relations) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 15
20STCP03546 December 8, 2020
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY LENDING II, INC. vs THOMAS 9:04 AM
V. GIRARDI, INDIVIDUALLY, et al.
Judge: Honorable Richard L. Fruin CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: R. Inostroza ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances
For Defendant(s): No Appearances
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Nunc Pro Tunc Order
It appearing to the Court that through inadvertence and/or clerical error, the minute order of
12/07/2020 in the above-entitled action does not properly reflect the Court's order. Said minute
order is ordered corrected nunc pro tunc as of 12/08/2020, as follows:
By striking: 12/10/2020
By adding: 12/09/2020
Minute Order Page 1 of 1
Document Filed Date
December 08, 2020
Case Filing Date
October 27, 2020
Category
Confession of Judgment (non-domestic relations) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Other Clerk Judgment 10/27/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 15 20STCP03546 December 8, 2020 CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY LENDING II, INC. vs THOMAS 9:04 AM V. GIRARDI, INDIVIDUALLY, et al. Judge: Honorable Richard L. Fruin CSR: None Judicial Assistant: R. Inostroza ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances For Defendant(s): No Appearances NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Nunc Pro Tunc Order It appearing to the Court that through inadvertence and/or clerical error, the minute order of 12/07/2020 in the above-entitled action does not properly reflect the Court's order. Said minute order is ordered corrected nunc pro tunc as of 12/08/2020, as follows: By striking: 12/10/2020 By adding: 12/09/2020 Minute Order Page 1 of 1