arrow left
arrow right
  • EXPERT CAR WASHES, INC., ET AL. VS SCOTT ALBERT ARDITI Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • EXPERT CAR WASHES, INC., ET AL. VS SCOTT ALBERT ARDITI Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/09/2023 03:00 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk CIV-141 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY STATE BAR NO: 89755 / 185074 FOR COURT USE ONLY NAME: Curtis A. Graham / Dawn B. Eyerly FIRM NAME: FREEMAN, FREEMAN & SMILEY, LLP STREET ADDRESS: 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1500 CITY: Los Angeles STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 90067 TELEPHONE NO.: 310-255-6100 FAX NO.: 310-255-6200 E-MAIL ADDRESS: curtis.graham@ffslaw.com / dawn.eyerly@ffslaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Cross-Defendants Rafie Shouhed and Shahram Shouhed SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Central District (Stanley Mosk Courthouse) PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NATIONAL CAR WASHES, INC., et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: SCOTT ALBERT ARDITI, et al. CASE NUMBER: DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY 21STCV05032 IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION 1. (Name of party): Rafie Shouhed and Shahram Shouhed was served with a complaint an amended complaint an amended cross-complaint an answer other (specify): in the above-titled action. 2. For a demurrer or motion to strike, a responsive pleading is due on (date): March 10, 2023 DECLARATION I intend to file a demurrer, motion to strike, or motion for judgment on the pleadings in this action. Before I can do so, I am required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading that I am responding to at least five days before the date when the responsive pleading is due (if I am filing a demurrer or motion to strike) and at least five days before the last day a motion for judgment on the pleadings may be filed (if I am filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings). We have not been able to meet and confer. I have not previously requested an automatic extension of time. Therefore, on timely filing and serving a declaration that meets the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.41, 435.5, or 439, I am entitled to an automatic 30-day extension of time within which to file a responsive pleading or motion for judgment on the pleadings. I made a good faith attempt to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading at least five days before the date the responsive pleading was due (if I am filing a demurrer or motion to strike) and at least five days before the last day a motion for judgment on the pleadings may be filed (if I am filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings). I was unable to meet with that party because (the reasons why the parties could not meet and confer are stated): below on form MC-031, Attached Declaration Cross-complainant's counsel has been unable to meet and confer. The parties are still in settlement talks with the parties' appointed mediator. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: March 9, 2023 Curtis A. Graham  (NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) Rafie Shouhed and Shahram Shouhed Page 1 of 1 Form Approved for Optional Use Code of Civil Procedure, Judicial Council of California DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY §§ 430.41, 435.5, 439 CIV-141 [Rev. January 1, 2019] IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION www.courts.ca.gov 6 5716399.1 / 24594-805