On January 25, 2021 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ayala Jose,
Ayala Roxana,
and
General Motors Llc,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/15/2021 02:01 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Lara,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
David N. Barry, Esq. (SBN 219230) D
11845 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 1270W
Los Angeles, CA 90064
TELEPHONE NO.:(310) 684-5859 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 862-4539
dbarry@mylemonrights.com
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs, Jose & Roxana Ayala
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
c1TY AND z1P coDE: Los Angeles 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jose & Roxana Ayala
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: General Motors, LLC
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): W UNLIMITED CASE [:=J LIMITED CASE 21 STCV02946
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: May 26, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 69 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[:=J Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. W This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs, Jose & Roxana Ayala
b. [:=J This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): January 25, 2021
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. W All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [:=J The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [:=J have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [:=J have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [:=J have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. [:=J The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in W complaint [:=J cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Song-Beverly Warranty Act ("Lemon Law"). Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability under the
Song-Beverly Warranty Act. Breach of Express Warranty under the Song-Beverly Warranty Act.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
April 15, 2021
Case Filing Date
January 25, 2021
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 06/29/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.