arrow left
arrow right
  • NET PROTECT WORLDWIDE, LTD VS KEVIN LEUNG Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • NET PROTECT WORLDWIDE, LTD VS KEVIN LEUNG Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/23/2021 10:48 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Dunn,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Chris Polychron (SBN 230103) Coast Law Group, LLP 1140 S. Coast Hwy 101 Encinitas, CA 92024 TELEPHONE NO.: 760.942.8505 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): chris@coastlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Net Protect Worldwide, Ltd., dba Takedown Czar SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 600 E. Broadway MAILING ADDRESS: 600 E. Broadway CITY AND ZIP CODE: Glendale, CA 91206 BRANCH NAME: North Central District, Glendale Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Net Protect Worldwide, Ltd., dba Takedown Czar DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Kevin Leung CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 21GDCV00251 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: July 28, 2021 Time: 8:30 am Dept.: D Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Chris Polychron, counsel for plaintiff INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Net Protect Worldwide, Ltd., dba Takedown Czar b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): February 22, 2021 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): Defendant Kevin Leung. (A settlement with Mr. Leung is imminent). (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiff alleges that defendant misrepresented his identity in order to gain access to plaintiff's materials and to unlawfully compete. The Complaint alleges claims for fraud, violation of Penal Code § 528.5, and violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200). Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov