On February 22, 2021 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Net Protect Worldwide Ltd Dba Takedown Czar A Hong Kong Limited Liability Company,
and
Leung Kevin,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/23/2021 10:48 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Dunn,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Chris Polychron (SBN 230103)
Coast Law Group, LLP
1140 S. Coast Hwy 101
Encinitas, CA 92024
TELEPHONE NO.: 760.942.8505 FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): chris@coastlaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Net Protect Worldwide, Ltd., dba Takedown Czar
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 600 E. Broadway
MAILING ADDRESS: 600 E. Broadway
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Glendale, CA 91206
BRANCH NAME: North Central District, Glendale Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Net Protect Worldwide, Ltd., dba Takedown Czar
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Kevin Leung
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 21GDCV00251
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: July 28, 2021 Time: 8:30 am Dept.: D Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Chris Polychron, counsel for plaintiff
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Net Protect Worldwide, Ltd., dba Takedown Czar
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): February 22, 2021
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
Defendant Kevin Leung. (A settlement with Mr. Leung is imminent).
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiff alleges that defendant misrepresented his identity in order to gain access to plaintiff's materials and to unlawfully
compete. The Complaint alleges claims for fraud, violation of Penal Code § 528.5, and violation of California's Unfair
Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200).
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
July 23, 2021
Case Filing Date
February 22, 2021
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 09/08/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.